Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunmei Yu
dblp:348/6097
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0004-3048-7152ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 87% Digital forensics and information hiding · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
anti-money laundering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DenseFlow: Spotting Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Ethereum Transaction Graphs · WWW 2024 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › anti-money laundering
money laundering detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DenseFlow: Spotting Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Ethereum Transaction Graphs · WWW 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
dense subgraph discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DenseFlow: Spotting Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Ethereum Transaction Graphs · WWW 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › cryptocurrency forensics
ethereum transaction analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DenseFlow: Spotting Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Ethereum Transaction Graphs · WWW 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum flow · 1.5dense subgraph mining · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | DenseFlow: Spotting Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Ethereum Transaction GraphsabstractIn recent years, money laundering crimes on blockchain, especially on Ethereum, have become increasingly rampant, resulting in substantial losses. The unique features of money laundering on Ethereum, such as decentralization and pseudonymity, pose new challenges for Ethereum anti-money laundering. Specifically, the existence of dense and extensive laundering gangs and intricate multilayered laundering pathways makes it exceptionally challenging for regulators to identify suspicious accounts and trace money flows. To address this issue, we propose an innovative DenseFlow framework that effectively identifies and traces money laundering activities by finding dense subgraphs and applying the maximum flow idea. We conduct multiple experiments on four datasets from Ethereum to validate the effectiveness of our approach. The precision of our DenseFlow is 16.34% higher than the start-of-the-art comparison methods on average, highlighting its distinctive contribution to tackling money laundering issues on blockchain. Dan Lin 0007, Jiajing Wu, Yunmei Yu, Qishuang Fu, Zibin Zheng, Changlin Yang |
WWW | 3 |
| 2023 | Money Laundering Detection on Ethereum: Applying Traditional Approaches to New SceneabstractWith the continuous evolution of blockchain technology, cryptocurrency platforms such as Ethereum have emerged as centers for digital asset transactions and smart contracts deployment. However, this nascent financial ecosystem also introduces potential money laundering risks. The traditional financial industry has accumulated significant antimoney laundering (AML) experience and technical means for monitoring and detecting money laundering activities. Yet, the adaptability of these established AML algorithms in the context of blockchain remains unclear. This paper aims to investigate the practical adaptability of traditional AML algorithms on Ethereum data through empirical experiments. We gather eight real-world money laundering case datasets collected from Ethereum and conduct experiments using three traditional AML algorithms on these datasets. We evaluate the performance of these algorithms from various angles, including precision, recall, and the distribution of detected accounts' labels in comparison to the original datasets. It turns out algorithms demonstrate distinct performance in diverse money laundering cases, indicating that the adaptability of traditional AML algorithms on Ethereum data presents certain adaptability and limitations. Holoscope's accuracy demonstrates the value of dense subgraph properties in Ethereum money laundering detection, and further research can be conducted based on this model framework combined with the money laundering characteristics of Ethereum. Our study provides valuable insights for strengthening AML mechanisms on blockchain platforms and offers guidance for further research on detecting money laundering accounts in blockchain environments. Yunmei Yu, Jiajing Wu, Dan Lin 0007, Qishuang Fu |
ICPADS | 1 |