Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used for dento-maxillofacial diagnostics and treatment planning, and comprehensive multi-structure segmentation remains time-consuming, limiting large-scale, reproducible research. In this article, we present ToothFairy2, a MICCAI 2024 challenge on multi-structure segmentation in maxillofacial CBCT. The accompanying dataset comprises 530 CBCT volumes (480 public training, 50 hidden test) with expert 3D annotations of 42 classes, including maxilla, mandible, crowns, bridges, implants, inferior alveolar canals, maxillary sinuses, pharynx, and teeth labeled according to the International Tooth Numbering System (FDI). 26 international teams participated in ToothFairy2, and their methods were run and evaluated for voxel-wise multi-class segmentation using a standardized protocol. This report extends the evaluation of teeth to also investigate the current capabilities of tooth detection and FDI numbering. Furthermore, ranking stability was analyzed to assess the robustness of the final challenge outcome. Overall, challenge participants achieved consistently high performance for large, high-contrast structures such as jawbones, pharynx, and most teeth, while maxillary sinuses, dental restorations, and fine structures remain challenging due to class imbalance and metal artifacts. Analysis of tooth-related metrics further revealed that assigning correct FDI numbers was more challenging than delineating individual teeth. By releasing CBCT data, 3D annotations, baseline models, and evaluation code, ToothFairy2 establishes a long-term benchmark to drive the development of automated methods for robust, clinically meaningful multi-structure segmentation in maxillofacial CBCT.

Accurate delineation of pancreatic tumors on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is important for diagnosis, radiotherapy treatment planning, and outcome assessment, but remains challenging due to complex anatomy and subtle tumor appearance. In routine practice, tumor contours on MRI are produced manually, which is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. Radiotherapy on MRI-Linear Accelerator (MRI-Linac) systems further requires fast and consistent Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) contours for online adaptation, yet most public pancreas tumor segmentation benchmarks focus on Computed Tomography (CT). The Pancreatic Tumor Segmentation in Therapeutic and Diagnostic MRI (PANTHER) challenge addresses this gap by benchmarking automatic pancreatic tumor segmentation on MRI. The dataset includes contrast-enhanced T1-weighted diagnostic MRI and T2-weighted MRI-Linac scans with expert pancreas and tumor annotations, organized into two tasks: (1) tumor segmentation on diagnostic MRI and (2) tumor segmentation on MRI-Linac images. Performance was evaluated using overlap metrics, distance-based metrics, and tumor volume error. The challenge attracted 285 registered participants, with 12 and 9 final submissions for Tasks 1 and 2, respectively. On diagnostic MRI, top methods achieved performance close to inter-reader agreement. Multi-reader analysis suggested that models often reproduced the contouring style of the training annotator, highlighting the importance of annotation quality and consensus. In contrast, performance on MRI-Linac images was lower and more heterogeneous, including cases of complete localization failure. PANTHER provides the first public benchmark for pancreatic tumor segmentation on MRI, showing that clinically useful automation is feasible on diagnostic MRI, while robust MRI-Linac GTV segmentation remains an open challenge.

In this work, we present LesionLocator, a framework for zero-shot longitudinal lesion tracking and segmentation in 3D medical imaging, establishing the first end-to-end model capable of 4D tracking with dense spatial prompts. Our model leverages an extensive dataset of 23,262 annotated medical scans, as well as synthesized longitudinal data across diverse lesion types. The diversity and scale of our dataset significantly enhances model generalizability to real-world medical imaging challenges and addresses key limitations in longitudinal data availability. LesionLocator outperforms all existing promptable models in lesion segmentation by nearly 10 dice points, reaching human-level performance, and achieves state-of-the-art results in lesion tracking, with superior lesion retrieval and segmentation accuracy. LesionLocator not only sets a new benchmark in universal promptable lesion segmentation and automated longitudinal lesion tracking but also provides the first open-access solution of its kind, releasing our synthetic 4D dataset and model to the community, empowering future advancements in medical imaging. Code is available at: www.github.com/MIC-DKFZ/LesionLocator

In recent years, several algorithms have been developed for the segmentation of the Inferior Alveolar Canal (IAC) in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. However, the availability of public datasets in this domain is limited, resulting in a lack of comparative evaluation studies on a common benchmark. To address this scientific gap and encourage deep learning research in the field, the ToothFairy challenge was organized within the MICCAI 2023 conference. In this context, a public dataset was released to also serve as a benchmark for future research. The dataset comprises 443 CBCT scans, with voxel-level annotations of the IAC available for 153 of them, making it the largest publicly available dataset of its kind. The participants of the challenge were tasked with developing an algorithm to accurately identify the IAC using the 2D and 3D-annotated scans. This paper presents the details of the challenge and the contributions made by the most promising methods proposed by the participants. It represents the first comprehensive comparative evaluation of IAC segmentation methods on a common benchmark dataset, providing insights into the current state-of-the-art algorithms and outlining future research directions. Furthermore, to ensure reproducibility and promote future developments, an open-source repository that collects the implementations of the best submissions was released.

How can we test AI performance? This question seems trivial, but it isn't. Standard benchmarks often have problems such as in-distribution and small-size test sets, oversimplified metrics, unfair comparisons, and short-term outcome pressure. As a consequence, good performance on standard benchmarks does not guarantee success in real-world scenarios. To address these problems, we present Touchstone, a large-scale collaborative segmentation benchmark of 9 types of abdominal organs. This benchmark is based on 5,195 training CT scans from 76 hospitals around the world and 5,903 testing CT scans from 11 additional hospitals. This diverse test set enhances the statistical significance of benchmark results and rigorously evaluates AI algorithms across various out-of-distribution scenarios. We invited 14 inventors of 19 AI algorithms to train their algorithms, while our team, as a third party, independently evaluated these algorithms on three test sets. In addition, we also evaluated pre-existing AI frameworks---which, differing from algorithms, are more flexible and can support different algorithms—including MONAI from NVIDIA, nnU-Net from DKFZ, and numerous other open-source frameworks. We are committed to expanding this benchmark to encourage more innovation of AI algorithms for the medical domain.