Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yannick Prudent
dblp:348/6379
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
differentially private training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
lipschitz-constrained networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lipschitz constraint · 1.5DP-SGD · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network WayabstractState-of-the-art approaches for training Differentially Private (DP) Deep Neural Networks (DNN) face difficulties to estimate tight bounds on the sensitivity of the network's layers, and instead rely on a process of per-sample gradient clipping. This clipping process not only biases the direction of gradients but also proves costly both in memory consumption and in computation. To provide sensitivity bounds and bypass the drawbacks of the clipping process, we propose to rely on Lipschitz constrained networks. Our theoretical analysis reveals an unexplored link between the Lipschitz constant with respect to their input and the one with respect to their parameters. By bounding the Lipschitz constant of each layer with respect to its parameters, we prove that we can train these networks with privacy guarantees. Our analysis not only allows the computation of the aforementioned sensitivities at scale, but also provides guidance on how to maximize the gradient-to-noise ratio for fixed privacy guarantees. To facilitate the application of Lipschitz networks and foster robust and certifiable learning under privacy guarantees, we provide a Python package that implements building blocks allowing the construction and private training of such networks. Louis Béthune, Thomas Massena, Thibaut Boissin, Aurélien Bellet, Franck Mamalet, Yannick Prudent, Corentin Friedrich, Mathieu Serrurier, David Vigouroux |
ICLR | 6 |