Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel J. Williams
dblp:348/6386
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 70% Generative modeling · 30% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Approximate Stein Classes for Truncated Density Estimation · ICML 2023 Estimating Density Models with Truncation Boundaries using Score Matching · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.8 | 2 | 2023 | Approximate Stein Classes for Truncated Density Estimation · ICML 2023 Estimating Density Models with Truncation Boundaries using Score Matching · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › divergence measure
stein discrepancy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Approximate Stein Classes for Truncated Density Estimation · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization › duality theory
dual optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Approximate Stein Classes for Truncated Density Estimation · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization › duality theory
lagrangian dual |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Approximate Stein Classes for Truncated Density Estimation · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score matching · 1.9lagrangian duality · 1.3kernelized stein discrepancy · 1.3weighted fisher divergence · 0.6stein discrepancy · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | High-Dimensional Differential Parameter Inference in Exponential Family using Time Score MatchingabstractThis paper addresses differential inference in time-varying parametric probabilistic models, like graphical models with changing structures. Instead of estimating a high-dimensional model at each time and estimating changes later, we directly learn the differential parameter, i.e., the time derivative of the parameter. The main idea is treating the time score function of an exponential family model as a linear model of the differential parameter for direct estimation. We use time score matching to estimate parameter derivatives. We prove the consistency of a regularized score matching objective and demonstrate the finite-sample normality of a debiased estimator in high-dimensional settings. Our methodology effectively infers differential structures in high-dimensional graphical models, verified on simulated and real-world datasets. The code reproducing our experiments can be found at: \url{https://github.com/Leyangw/tsm}. Daniel J. Williams, Leyang Wang, Qizhen Ying, Song Liu 0002, Mladen Kolar |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2023 | Approximate Stein Classes for Truncated Density EstimationabstractEstimating truncated density models is difficult, as these models have intractable normalising constants and hard to satisfy boundary conditions. Score matching can be adapted to solve the truncated density estimation problem, but requires a continuous weighting function which takes zero at the boundary and is positive elsewhere. Evaluation of such a weighting function (and its gradient) often requires a closed-form expression of the truncation boundary and finding a solution to a complicated optimisation problem. In this paper, we propose approximate Stein classes, which in turn leads to a relaxed Stein identity for truncated density estimation. We develop a novel discrepancy measure, truncated kernelised Stein discrepancy (TKSD), which does not require fixing a weighting function in advance, and can be evaluated using only samples on the boundary. We estimate a truncated density model by minimising the Lagrangian dual of TKSD. Finally, experiments show the accuracy of our method to be an improvement over previous works even without the explicit functional form of the boundary. Daniel J. Williams, Song Liu 0002 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Estimating Density Models with Truncation Boundaries using Score MatchingabstractTruncated densities are probability density functions defined on truncated domains. They share the same parametric form with their non-truncated counterparts up to a normalizing constant. Since the computation of their normalizing constants is usually infeasible, Maximum Likelihood Estimation cannot be easily applied to estimate truncated density models. Score Matching (SM) is a powerful tool for fitting parameters using only unnormalized models. However, it cannot be directly applied here as boundary conditions that derive a tractable SM objective are not satisfied by truncated densities. This paper studies parameter estimation for truncated probability densities using SM. The estimator minimizes a weighted Fisher divergence. The weight function is simply the shortest distance from a data point to the domain's boundary. We show this choice of weight function naturally arises from minimizing the Stein discrepancy and upper bounding the finite-sample estimation error. We demonstrate the usefulness of our method via numerical experiments and a study on the Chicago crime data set. We also show that the proposed density estimation can correct the outlier-trimming bias caused by aggressive outlier detection methods. Song Liu 0002, Takafumi Kanamori, Daniel J. Williams |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |