Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Victor Livernoche
dblp:348/6428
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3819-730XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion-based perception
diffusion-based anomaly detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detection · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detection · ICLR 2024 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detection · ICLR 2024 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › outlier detection
density-based outlier detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detection · ICLR 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Deepfakes in the 2025 Canadian Election: Prevalence, Partisanship, and Platform Dynamics · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deepfake detector · 2.0diffusion time estimation · 1.5denoising diffusion probabilistic model · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Deepfakes in the 2025 Canadian Election: Prevalence, Partisanship, and Platform DynamicsabstractConcerns about AI-generated political content are growing, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how deepfakes appear and circulate across social platforms during major events in democratic countries. We analyze the 2025 Canadian federal election across X, Bluesky, and Reddit using a high-accuracy detector trained on diverse modern generative models, covering 187,778 posts. We find that 5.9% of election-related images were deepfakes. Right-leaning accounts shared them more often (9.2% of images flagged) than left-leaning users (3.9%), with flagged content more frequently defamatory or conspiratorial. Yet, most detected deepfakes were benign or non-political, and harmful ones drew little attention, accounting for only 0.1% of all views on X. Overall, deepfakes were present in the election conversation, but their reach was modest, and realistic fabricated images, although less common, drew higher engagement, highlighting growing concerns about their misuses. Victor Livernoche, Andreea Musulan, Zachary Yang, Jean-François Godbout, Reihaneh Rabbany |
WWW | 1 |
| 2024 | On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly DetectionabstractKnown for their impressive performance in generative modeling, diffusion models are attractive candidates for density-based anomaly detection. This paper investigates different variations of diffusion modeling for unsupervised and semi-supervised anomaly detection. In particular, we find that Denoising Diffusion Probability Models (DDPM) are performant on anomaly detection benchmarks yet computationally expensive. By simplifying DDPM in application to anomaly detection, we are naturally led to an alternative approach called Diffusion Time Estimation (DTE). DTE estimates the distribution over diffusion time for a given input and uses the mode or mean of this distribution as the anomaly score. We derive an analytical form for this density and leverage a deep neural network to improve inference efficiency. Through empirical evaluations on the ADBench benchmark, we demonstrate that all diffusion-based anomaly detection methods perform competitively for both semi-supervised and unsupervised settings. Notably, DTE achieves orders of magnitude faster inference time than DDPM, while outperforming it on this benchmark. These results establish diffusion-based anomaly detection as a scalable alternative to traditional methods and recent deep-learning techniques for standard unsupervised and semi-supervised anomaly detection settings. Victor Livernoche, Vineet Jain, Yashar Hezaveh, Siamak Ravanbakhsh |
ICLR | 1 |