EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niels van Nistelrooij
dblp:348/6578
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-9123-9756ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › medical image segmentation
3d medical image segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Segmenting Maxillofacial Structures in CBCT Volumes · CVPR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
dental imaging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Segmenting Maxillofacial Structures in CBCT Volumes · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.7nnu-net · 1.7mamba-based architecture · 1.7convolutional network · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Beyond benchmarks: Towards robust artificial intelligence bone segmentation in socio-technical systemsabstractDespite the advances in automated medical image segmentation, AI models still underperform in various clinical settings, posing challenges for integration into real-world workflows. In this pre-registered prospective multicenter evaluation, we analyzed 20 state-of-the-art mandibular segmentation models across 19,218 segmentations of 1,000 clinically resampled CT/CBCT scans. Our results suggest that for a given model, segmentation accuracy can vary by up to 25% in Dice score as socio-technical factors such as voxel size, bone orientation, and patient conditions (e.g., osteosynthesis or pathology) shift from favorable to adverse. Higher sharpness, isotropic smaller voxels, and neutral orientation significantly improved results, while metallic osteosynthesis and anatomical complexity led to significant degradation. Our findings challenge the common view of AI models as “plug-and-play” tools and suggest evidence-based optimization recommendations for both clinicians and developers. This will in turn boost the integration of AI segmentation tools in routine healthcare. Kunpeng Xie, Lennart Johannes Gruber, Martin Crampen, Elias Tappeiner, Maxime Gillot, Jan Schepers, Jiangchang Xu, Tobias Pankert, Michel Beyer, Negar Shahamiri, Reinier ten Brink, Gauthier Dot, Charlotte Weschke, Niels van Nistelrooij, Pieter-Jan Verhelst, Zhibin Xu, Jonas Bienzeisler, Ashkan Rashad, Tabea Flügge, Ross Cotton, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Robert R. Ilesan, Stefan Raith, Dennis Madsen, Constantin Seibold, Tong Xi 0001, Stefaan Bergé, Sven Nebelung, Oldrich Kodym, Osku Sundqvist, Florian M. Thieringer, Hans Lamecker, Antoine Coppens, Thomas Potrusil, Joep Kraeima, Max J. H. Witjes, Guomin Wu, Xiaojun Chen 0003, Adriaan Lambrechts, Stefan Zachow, Alexander Hermans, Daniel Truhn, Victor Alves, Jan Egger, Rainer Röhrig, Frank Hölzle, Behrus Hinrichs-Puladi |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 16 |
| 2026 | Multi-structure segmentation in CBCT volumes: The ToothFairy2 challengeabstractCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used for dento-maxillofacial diagnostics and treatment planning, and comprehensive multi-structure segmentation remains time-consuming, limiting large-scale, reproducible research. In this article, we present ToothFairy2, a MICCAI 2024 challenge on multi-structure segmentation in maxillofacial CBCT. The accompanying dataset comprises 530 CBCT volumes (480 public training, 50 hidden test) with expert 3D annotations of 42 classes, including maxilla, mandible, crowns, bridges, implants, inferior alveolar canals, maxillary sinuses, pharynx, and teeth labeled according to the International Tooth Numbering System (FDI). 26 international teams participated in ToothFairy2, and their methods were run and evaluated for voxel-wise multi-class segmentation using a standardized protocol. This report extends the evaluation of teeth to also investigate the current capabilities of tooth detection and FDI numbering. Furthermore, ranking stability was analyzed to assess the robustness of the final challenge outcome. Overall, challenge participants achieved consistently high performance for large, high-contrast structures such as jawbones, pharynx, and most teeth, while maxillary sinuses, dental restorations, and fine structures remain challenging due to class imbalance and metal artifacts. Analysis of tooth-related metrics further revealed that assigning correct FDI numbers was more challenging than delineating individual teeth. By releasing CBCT data, 3D annotations, baseline models, and evaluation code, ToothFairy2 establishes a long-term benchmark to drive the development of automated methods for robust, clinically meaningful multi-structure segmentation in maxillofacial CBCT. Federico Bolelli, Luca Lumetti, Niels van Nistelrooij, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Mattia Di Bartolomeo, Kevin Marchesini, Arrigo Pellacani, Ettore Candeloro, Gabriele Rosati, Tong Xi 0001, Fabian Isensee, Yannick Kirchhoff, Lars Krämer, Maximilian Rokuss, Constantin Ulrich, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Yuxian Jiang, Yusheng Liu 0001, Lisheng Wang, Haoshen Wang, Zhiming Cui 0001, Zhaohong Pan, Xiaokun Liang, Ender Konukoglu, Marek Wodzinski, Henning Müller, Haipeng Mai, Xiaobing Dang, Shrajan Bhandary, Radu Grosu, Stefaan Bergé, Alexandre Anesi, Costantino Grana |
Medical Image Anal. | 3 |
| 2026 | ToothSeg: Robust Tooth Instance Segmentation and Numbering in CBCT Using Deep Learning and Self-CorrectionabstractAccurate interpretation of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans is critical for oral diagnosis and treatment planning. Existing methods for automated tooth segmentation in CBCT face challenges, such as difficulties in generalizing across imaging artifacts and anatomical variations, as well as requiring manual revisions in many cases. To address these limitations, this study introduces ToothSeg, a fully automated approach for tooth instance segmentation and numbering in CBCT using deep learning and self-correction. ToothSeg combines semantic and instance segmentation into a unified method where their respective strengths are complemented. In particular, self-correction is employed when combining the segmentations, resolving merged or split teeth and determining the optimal sequence of tooth numbers for each dental arch. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation using a diverse in-house dataset (n = 1282, 25+ devices) and the publicly available ToothFairy2 challenge dataset (n = 480, 1 device), including an ablation study, a comparison to state-of-the-art methods, and an analysis of challenging cases. Compared to an optimized semantic segmentation model, including instance segmentation and self-correction consistently improved tooth segmentation (True Positive Dice: 93.6% to 94.3%) and tooth detection and numbering (multiclass instance F1: 94.2% to 95.5%). Furthermore, ToothSeg outperformed the other methods on both datasets (True Positive Dice: $\geq$ +0.4%, multiclass instance F1: $\geq$ +1.8%), particularly for challenging cases. This study provides a promising approach for automated tooth segmentation and numbering in CBCT, which is significant for reducing manual workload and supporting scalable, data-driven research in oral and craniofacial health. Niels van Nistelrooij, Lars Krämer, Steven Kempers, Michel Beyer, Federico Bolelli, Tong Xi 0001, Stefaan Bergé, Max Heiland, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Fabian Isensee |
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics | 1 |
| 2025 | Segmenting Maxillofacial Structures in CBCT VolumesabstractCone-Beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a standard imaging modality in orofacial and dental practices, providing essential 3D volumetric imaging of anatomical structures, including jawbones, teeth, sinuses, and neurovascular canals. Accurately segmenting these structures is fundamental to numerous clinical applications, such as surgical planning and implant placement. However, manual segmentation of CBCT scans is time-intensive and requires expert input, creating a demand for automated solutions through deep learning. Effective development of such algorithms relies on access to large, well-annotated datasets, yet current datasets are often privately stored or limited in scope and considered structures, especially concerning 3D annotations. This paper proposes ToothFairy2, a comprehensive, publicly accessible CBCT dataset with voxel-level 3D annotations of 42 distinct classes corresponding to maxillofacial structures. We validate the dataset by benchmarking state-of-the-art neural network models, including convolutional, transformer-based, and hybrid Mamba-Based architectures, to evaluate segmentation performance across complex anatomical regions. Our work also explores adaptations to the nnU-Net framework to optimize multi-class segmentation for maxillofacial anatomy. The proposed dataset provides a fundamental resource for advancing maxillofacial segmentation and supports future research in automated 3D image analysis in digital dentistry. Federico Bolelli, Kevin Marchesini, Niels van Nistelrooij, Luca Lumetti, Vittorio Pipoli, Elisa Ficarra, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Costantino Grana |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2025 | Segmenting the Inferior Alveolar Canal in CBCTs Volumes: The ToothFairy ChallengeabstractIn recent years, several algorithms have been developed for the segmentation of the Inferior Alveolar Canal (IAC) in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. However, the availability of public datasets in this domain is limited, resulting in a lack of comparative evaluation studies on a common benchmark. To address this scientific gap and encourage deep learning research in the field, the ToothFairy challenge was organized within the MICCAI 2023 conference. In this context, a public dataset was released to also serve as a benchmark for future research. The dataset comprises 443 CBCT scans, with voxel-level annotations of the IAC available for 153 of them, making it the largest publicly available dataset of its kind. The participants of the challenge were tasked with developing an algorithm to accurately identify the IAC using the 2D and 3D-annotated scans. This paper presents the details of the challenge and the contributions made by the most promising methods proposed by the participants. It represents the first comprehensive comparative evaluation of IAC segmentation methods on a common benchmark dataset, providing insights into the current state-of-the-art algorithms and outlining future research directions. Furthermore, to ensure reproducibility and promote future developments, an open-source repository that collects the implementations of the best submissions was released. Federico Bolelli, Luca Lumetti, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Mattia Di Bartolomeo, Arrigo Pellacani, Kevin Marchesini, Niels van Nistelrooij, Pieter van Lierop, Tong Xi 0001, Yusheng Liu 0001, Rui Xin 0003, Tao Yang 0037, Lisheng Wang, Haoshen Wang, Chenfan Xu, Zhiming Cui 0001, Marek Wodzinski, Henning Müller, Yannick Kirchhoff, Maximilian Rokuss, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Jae-Hwan Han, Wan Kim, Hong-Gi Ahn, Tomasz Szczepanski, Michal K. Grzeszczyk, Przemyslaw Korzeniowski, Vicent Caselles, Xavier Paolo Burgos-Artizzu, Ferran Prados, Stefaan Bergé, Bram van Ginneken, Alexandre Anesi, Costantino Grana |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 7 |