Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeth F. Evans

dblp:348/6674 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
narrative understanding
0.712023
Grounding Characters and Places in Narrative Text · ACL (1) 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contextual embeddings · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Grounding Characters and Places in Narrative Text
abstract
Tracking characters and locations throughout a story can help improve the understanding of its plot structure.Prior research has analyzed characters and locations from text independently without grounding characters to their locations in narrative time.Here, we address this gap by proposing a new spatial relationship categorization task.The objective of the task is to assign a spatial relationship category for every character and location co-mention within a window of text, taking into consideration linguistic context, narrative tense, and temporal scope.To this end, we annotate spatial relationships in approximately 2500 book excerpts and train a model using contextual embeddings as features to predict these relationships.When applied to a set of books, this model allows us to test several hypotheses on mobility and domestic space, revealing that protagonists are more mobile than non-central characters and that women as characters tend to occupy more interior space than men.Overall, our work is the first step towards joint modeling and analysis of characters and places in narrative text.
Sandeep Soni, Amanpreet Sihra, Elizabeth F. Evans, Matthew Wilkens, David Bamman
ACL (1)3