Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Federico Lozano-Cuadra
dblp:348/9320
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-6238-1369ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Routing and switching · 43% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 29% Edge and fog computing · 29% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Edge and fog computing
continuous learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Routing and switching › adaptive routing
deep reinforcement learning-based routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Routing and switching › routing
distributed routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Edge and fog computing › distributed learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › satellite networks
LEO satellite constellation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Routing and switching
routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
satellite networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
federated learning · 0.9deep reinforcement learning · 0.9deep neural network · 0.9continual learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite RoutingabstractThis paper introduces a full solution for decentralized routing in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Constellations (LSatCs) based on continual Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), specifically designed for on-board implementation in satellites with limited computational and communication resources. This requires addressing multiple challenges, including the partial knowledge at the satellites and their continuous movement, and the time-varying sources of uncertainty in the system, such as traffic, communication links, or communication buffers. We follow a multi-agent approach, where each satellite acts as an independent decision-making agent, while acquiring a limited knowledge of the environment based on the feedback received from the nearby agents. The solution is divided into two phases. First, an offline learning phase relies on decentralized decisions and a global Deep Neural Network (DNN) trained with global experiences to learn the optimal paths. Then, the online phase with local, on-board, and pre-trained DNNs requires continual learning to evolve with the environment, which can be done in two different ways: (1) Model anticipation, where the predictable conditions of the constellation, resulting from its orbital dynamics, are exploited by each satellite sharing local model with the next satellite; and (2) Federated Learning (FL), where each agent’s model is merged first at the cluster level and then aggregated in a global Parameter Server (PS) at ground or at a geostationary orbit (GEO) satellite. Results from simulations with State-of-the-Art (SoA) constellations such show that the proposed approach converges in less than a second to similar end-to-end (E2E) latency than the shortest-path centralized approach with full knowledge of the network. Moreover, the Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) metric quantifies the necessary alignment of the models when the dynamics of the environment change. Federico Lozano-Cuadra, Beatriz Soret, Israel Leyva-Mayorga, Petar Popovski |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |