Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Federico Lozano-Cuadra

dblp:348/9320 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-6238-1369ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 43% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 29% Edge and fog computing · 29%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Edge and fog computing
continuous learning
0.912025
Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Routing and switching › adaptive routing
deep reinforcement learning-based routing
0.912025
Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Routing and switching › routing
distributed routing
0.912025
Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Edge and fog computing › distributed learning
federated learning
0.912025
Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › satellite networks
LEO satellite constellation
0.912025
Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Routing and switching
routing
0.912025
Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
satellite networks
0.912025
Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

federated learning · 0.9deep reinforcement learning · 0.9deep neural network · 0.9continual learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Continual Deep Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Satellite Routing
abstract
This paper introduces a full solution for decentralized routing in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Constellations (LSatCs) based on continual Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), specifically designed for on-board implementation in satellites with limited computational and communication resources. This requires addressing multiple challenges, including the partial knowledge at the satellites and their continuous movement, and the time-varying sources of uncertainty in the system, such as traffic, communication links, or communication buffers. We follow a multi-agent approach, where each satellite acts as an independent decision-making agent, while acquiring a limited knowledge of the environment based on the feedback received from the nearby agents. The solution is divided into two phases. First, an offline learning phase relies on decentralized decisions and a global Deep Neural Network (DNN) trained with global experiences to learn the optimal paths. Then, the online phase with local, on-board, and pre-trained DNNs requires continual learning to evolve with the environment, which can be done in two different ways: (1) Model anticipation, where the predictable conditions of the constellation, resulting from its orbital dynamics, are exploited by each satellite sharing local model with the next satellite; and (2) Federated Learning (FL), where each agent’s model is merged first at the cluster level and then aggregated in a global Parameter Server (PS) at ground or at a geostationary orbit (GEO) satellite. Results from simulations with State-of-the-Art (SoA) constellations such show that the proposed approach converges in less than a second to similar end-to-end (E2E) latency than the shortest-path centralized approach with full knowledge of the network. Moreover, the Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) metric quantifies the necessary alignment of the models when the dynamics of the environment change.
Federico Lozano-Cuadra, Beatriz Soret, Israel Leyva-Mayorga, Petar Popovski
IEEE Trans. Commun.1