EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tom A. Lamb
dblp:348/9410
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 41% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Vision and language · 9% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Focus On This, Not That! Steering LLMs with Adaptive Feature Specification · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Focus On This, Not That! Steering LLMs with Adaptive Feature Specification · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable Questions · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Focus On This, Not That! Steering LLMs with Adaptive Feature Specification · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › model steering
representation steering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Focus On This, Not That! Steering LLMs with Adaptive Feature Specification · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Universal In-Context Approximation By Prompting Fully Recurrent Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Universal In-Context Approximation By Prompting Fully Recurrent Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
shape perception |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory › neural network approximation
universal approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Universal In-Context Approximation By Prompting Fully Recurrent Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
perception robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test-time detection · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9information flow analysis · 0.9feature specification · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.8LSRL programming language · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable QuestionsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet inaccurate responses, introducing significant risks for deployment in safety-critical domains.We present a novel, test-time approach to detecting model hallucination through systematic analysis of information flow across model layers.We target cases when LLMs process inputs with ambiguous or insufficient context.Our investigation reveals that hallucination manifests as usable information deficiencies in inter-layer transmissions.While existing approaches primarily focus on final-layer output analysis, we demonstrate that tracking cross-layer information dynamics (LI) provides robust indicators of model reliability, accounting for both information gain and loss during computation.LI integrates easily with pretrained LLMs without requiring additional training or architectural modifications. Hazel Kim, Tom A. Lamb, Adel Bibi, Philip Torr 0001, Yarin Gal |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | Focus On This, Not That! Steering LLMs with Adaptive Feature SpecificationabstractDespite the success of Instruction Tuning (IT) in training large language models (LLMs), such models often leverage spurious or biased features learnt from their training data and can become misaligned, leading to undesired behaviours. While existing techniques can steer model behaviour at inference-time, they are often post-hoc and do not embed steering as an intrinsic model feature. In this work, we introduce Focus Instruction Tuning (FIT), which trains LLMs to condition their responses by focusing on specific features whilst ignoring others, leading to different behaviours based on what features are specified. Across diverse benchmarks, we demonstrate that FIT: (i) successfully steers behaviour at inference time; (ii) increases robustness by amplifying core task signals and down-weighting spurious cues; (iii) mitigates social bias by suppressing demographic attributes; and (iv) generalises under distribution shifts and to previously unseen focus features. FIT therefore offers a lightweight, intrinsic mechanism for building more robust, fair, and easily controllable LLMs. Tom A. Lamb, Adam Davies, Alasdair Paren, Philip Torr 0001, Francesco Pinto |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language ModelsabstractDespite the importance of shape perception in human vision, early neural image classifiers relied less on shape information for object recognition than other (often spurious) features. While recent research suggests that current large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) exhibit more reliance on shape, we find them to still be seriously limited in this regard. To quantify such limitations, we introduce IllusionBench, a dataset that challenges current cutting-edge VLMs to decipher shape information when the shape is represented by an arrangement of visual elements in a scene. Our extensive evaluations reveal that, while these shapes are easily detectable by human annotators, current VLMs struggle to recognize them, indicating important avenues for future work in developing more robust visual perception systems. The full dataset and codebase are available at: https://arshiahemmat.github.io/illusionbench/ Arshia Hemmat, Adam Davies, Tom A. Lamb, Jianhao Yuan, Philip Torr 0001, Ashkan Khakzar, Francesco Pinto |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Universal In-Context Approximation By Prompting Fully Recurrent ModelsabstractZero-shot and in-context learning enable solving tasks without model fine-tuning, making them essential for developing generative model solutions. Therefore, it is crucial to understand whether a pretrained model can be prompted to approximate any function, i.e., whether it is a universal in-context approximator. While it was recently shown that transformer models do possess this property, these results rely on their attention mechanism. Hence, these findings do not apply to fully recurrent architectures like RNNs, LSTMs, and the increasingly popular SSMs. We demonstrate that RNNs, LSTMs, GRUs, Linear RNNs, and linear gated architectures such as Mamba and Hawk/Griffin can also serve be universal in-context approximators. To streamline our argument, we introduce a programming language called LSRL that compiles to these fully recurrent architectures. LSRL may be of independent interest for further studies of fully recurrent models, such as constructing interpretability benchmarks. We also study the role of multiplicative gating and observe that architectures incorporating such gating (e.g., LSTMs, GRUs, Hawk/Griffin) can implement certain operations more stably, making them more viable candidates for practical in-context universal approximation. Aleksandar Petrov, Tom A. Lamb, Alasdair Paren, Philip Torr 0001, Adel Bibi |
NeurIPS | 2 |