Compute Express Link (CXL) fundamentally shifts the memory abstraction boundary, moving memory management functions from the host CPU to external controllers. While this decoupling allows hyperscalers to integrate diverse media, such as cost-effective, recycled DDR4 modules, it transforms the memory controller into a complex system with new integration challenges. First, we uncover that integrating CXL and memory controller IPs via the industry-standard AXI interconnect creates critical bottlenecks. We demonstrate that variable access latency and out-of-order responses, essential for CXL, can quickly saturate the limited AXI tag space, limiting bandwidth and even causing system hangs in commercial platforms. However, this decoupled architecture also creates a unique opportunity: the CXL controller can exploit its support for variable-latency responses and near-memory processing to implement transparent reliability and security mechanisms. We propose ReScue, a suite of hardware solutions implemented and validated on an Intel Agilex platform. ReScue-R leverages CXL's variable access latency and out-of-order responses to transparently retrieve remapping addresses stored within faulty blocks. By utilizing a Bloom filter to predict faults and minimize overhead, it achieves fault tolerance$9.6 \times 10^{4}$times higher than standard SECDED ECC with only 0.2% performance degradation. ReScue-S addresses security; after demonstrating the first successful Row Hammer (RH) bit flips and physical-address reconstruction on a CXL system, we show that ReScue-S can shape response latencies to prevent timing-based side-channel attacks with only 1.1% performance degradation. Finally, we propose a solution to the discovered AXI-induced system hangs to ensure stable CXL operation.

As the end of Moore’s law approaches, chiplet integration technology (or chiplet technology) has emerged to revolutionize future semiconductor chip design. Chiplet technology provides unique advantages over 3-D-stacking technology, including a more cost-efficient and thermal-friendly integration of heterogeneous technologies. Although chiplet technologies have already begun to be used by the latest commercial chips, they have not been explored for commodity dynamic random access memory (DRAM) design yet. Harnessing its advantages for DRAM for the first time, this article evaluates the feasibility of chiplet-based DRAM architecture, considering various physical and electrical constraints imposed by a standard chiplet interface [i.e., universal chiplet interconnect express (UCIe)]. We further explore the DIMM architectures that simplify module packaging and assembly, leading to reductions in total die size and overall costs. The comprehensive cross-level analysis (i.e., device, circuit, chip, and system levels) shows that chiplet-based DRAM reducest_RCD+t_CAS, latency-critical DRAM timing parameters, by$1.32\times $–$1.39\times $, at the same energy consumption. In addition, a$1.39\times $–$2.28\times $improvement int_RRDis obtained. The reduced DRAM timing parameters improve the overall system performance by up to 8.8%–24.7% (geomean 3.4%–8.4%) in real-life benchmarks. The chiplet-based heterogeneous integration achieves a$1.27\times $higher chip-level yield compared with the monolithic chip, along with up to 10% reduction in overall cost compared with traditional DIMMs at emerging process technologies.

Row Hammer (RH) has been demonstrated as a security vulnerability in modern systems. Although commodity CPUs can handle RH-induced single-bit errors in DRAM through ECC, RH can still give rise to multi-bit uncorrectable errors (UEs) and crash the systems. Meanwhile, recent work has indicated that the DRAM cells vulnerable to RH are determined by manufacturing imperfections and resulting defects. Taking one step further from the recent work, we first conduct RH experiments on contemporary DRAM modules for 3 weeks. This demonstrates that RH-induced UEs occur only at specific DRAM addresses (RH-UE-vulnerable addresses) and the percentage of such addresses is small in these DRAM modules. Second, to protect the systems from RH-induced UEs, we propose two RH defense solutions: H- and S-TAROT (TArgeted ROw-Hammer Therapy). H-TAROT is a software-based solution running on the host CPU. It obtains RH-UE-vulnerable addresses during the system boot and then periodically accesses such addresses before UEs may occur. Since it accesses only a small percentage of addresses, it does not incur a notable performance penalty for throughput applications (e.g., a 1.5% increase in execution time of the SPECrate 2017 benchmark suite running on a system even with 128GB of DRAM). Yet, it imposes a significant performance penalty on latency-sensitive applications (e.g., a 28.2% increase in tail latency of Redis). To minimize the performance penalty, for a system with a SmartNIC (SNIC), S-TAROT offloads H-TAROT from the host CPU to the SNIC CPU. Our experiment shows that S-TAROT increases the execution time and tail latency of the SPECrate 2017 benchmark suite and Redis by only 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively.

The demand for precise information on DRAM microarchitectures and error characteristics has surged, driven by the need to explore processing in memory, enhance reliability, and mitigate security vulnerability. Nonetheless, DRAM manufacturers have disclosed only a limited amount of information, making it difficult to find specific information on their DRAM microarchitectures. This paper addresses this gap by presenting more rigorous findings on the microarchitectures of commodity DRAM chips and their impacts on the characteristics of activate-induced bitflips (AIBs), such as RowHammer and RowPress. The previous studies have also attempted to understand the DRAM microarchitectures and associated behaviors, but we have found some of their results to be misled by inaccurate address mapping and internal data swizzling, or lack of a deeper understanding of the modern DRAM cell structure. For accurate and efficient reverse-engineering, we use three tools: AIBs, retention time test, and RowCopy, which can be cross-validated. With these three tools, we first take a macroscopic view of modern DRAM chips to uncover the size, structure, and operation of their subarrays, memory array tiles (MATs), and rows. Then, we analyze AIB characteristics based on the microscopic view of the DRAM microarchitecture, such as 6F2cell layout, through which we rectify misunderstandings regarding AIBs and discover a new data pattern that accelerates AIBs. Lastly, based on our findings at both macroscopic and microscopic levels, we identify previously unknown AIB vulnerabilities and propose a simple yet effective protection solution.

The ever-growing demands for memory with larger capacity and higher bandwidth have driven recent innovations on memory expansion and disaggregation technologies based on Compute eXpress Link (CXL). Especially, CXL-based memory expansion technology has recently gained notable attention for its ability not only to economically expand memory capacity and bandwidth but also to decouple memory technologies from a specific memory interface of the CPU. However, since CXL memory devices have not been widely available, they have been emulated using DDR memory in a remote NUMA node. In this paper, for the first time, we comprehensively evaluate a true CXL-ready system based on the latest 4th-generation Intel Xeon CPU with three CXL memory devices from different manufacturers. Specifically, we run a set of microbenchmarks not only to compare the performance of true CXL memory with that of emulated CXL memory but also to analyze the complex interplay between the CPU and CXL memory in depth. This reveals important differences between emulated CXL memory and true CXL memory, some of which will compel researchers to revisit the analyses and proposals from recent work. Next, we identify opportunities for memory-bandwidth-intensive applications to benefit from the use of CXL memory. Lastly, we propose a CXL-memory-aware dynamic page allocation policy, Caption to more efficiently use CXL memory as a bandwidth expander. We demonstrate that Caption can automatically converge to an empirically favorable percentage of pages allocated to CXL memory, which improves the performance of memory-bandwidth-intensive applications by up to 24% when compared to the default page allocation policy designed for traditional NUMA systems.