Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haoxiong Liu
dblp:348/9571
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 39% Language models and text generation · 22% Question answering and dialogue systems · 22% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Augmenting Math Word Problems via Iterative Question Composing · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Augmenting Math Word Problems via Iterative Question Composing · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
math word problem solving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Augmenting Math Word Problems via Iterative Question Composing · AAAI 2025 |
Program verification › proof generation
LLM-based proof generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Program verification
proof generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated theorem proving
neural theorem proving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural collapse |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Quantifying the Variability Collapse of Neural Networks · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 2.6tree search · 1.7mixed prompting · 1.7rejection sampling · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9variability collapse index · 0.7linear probing · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Augmenting Math Word Problems via Iterative Question ComposingabstractDespite the advancements in large language models (LLMs) for mathematical reasoning, solving competition-level math problems remains a significant challenge, especially for open-source LLMs without external tools. We introduce the MMIQC dataset, comprising a mixture of processed web data and synthetic question-response pairs, aimed at enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of base language models. Models fine-tuned on MMIQC consistently surpass their counterparts in performance on the MATH benchmark across various model sizes. Notably, Qwen-72B-MMIQC achieves a 45.0% accuracy, exceeding the previous open-source state-of-the-art by 8.2% and outperforming the initial version GPT-4 released in 2023. Extensive evaluation results on Hungarian high school finals suggest that such improvement can generalize to unseen data. Our ablation study on MMIQC reveals that a large part of the improvement can be attributed to our novel augmentation method, Iterative Question Composing (IQC), which involves iteratively composing new questions from seed problems using an LLM and applying rejection sampling through another LLM. Haoxiong Liu, Yifan Zhang 0029, Andrew Chi-Chih Yao |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure AnalysisabstractThe synergy between deep learning models and traditional automation tools, such as built-in tactics of the proof assistant and off-the-shelf automated theorem provers, plays a crucial role in developing robust and efficient neural theorem provers~(NTPs).
However, for proof synthesis with LLMs, previous work applies automation tools either only when explicitly invoked by the model or at a single granularity level, failing to fully exploit their power.
To solve this issue, we propose ProofAug, a procedure that equips LLMs with automation methods at various granularities through fine-grained structure analysis of model-generated proof proposals.
ProofAug also serves as a versatile plug-and-play module that seamlessly integrates with any tree-search algorithm, enabling our construction of an efficient recursive proving (ERP) module to further enhance performance.
The superiority of our method is validated on the miniF2F benchmark using the open-source deepseek-math-7b-base model and the Isabelle proof assistant.
Notably, by additionally employing a mixed prompting strategy, we achieve a cumulative pass rate of 66.0% after curation of the dataset (61.9% for the original version) with 2100 queries to the model per problem (In contrast, the previous SOTA in Isabelle, Subgoal-XL, only achieves 56.1% using 16384 queries per problem).
We also implement a Lean 4 version of ProofAug that can improve the pass@1 performance of Kimina-Prover-Preview-Distill-1.5B from 44.3% to 50.4% on miniF2F-test.
Our code is available at https://github.com/haoxiongliu/ProofAug. Haoxiong Liu, Zhenguo Li, Andrew Chi-Chih Yao |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Quantifying the Variability Collapse of Neural NetworksabstractRecent studies empirically demonstrate the positive relationship between the transferability of neural networks and the in-class variation of the last layer features. The recently discovered Neural Collapse (NC) phenomenon provides a new perspective of understanding such last layer geometry of neural networks. In this paper, we propose a novel metric, named Variability Collapse Index (VCI), to quantify the variability collapse phenomenon in the NC paradigm. The VCI metric is well-motivated and intrinsically related to the linear probing loss on the last layer features. Moreover, it enjoys desired theoretical and empirical properties, including invariance under invertible linear transformations and numerical stability, that distinguishes it from previous metrics. Our experiments verify that VCI is indicative of the variability collapse and the transferability of pretrained neural networks. Jing Xu 0027, Haoxiong Liu |
ICML | 2 |