Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abihith Kothapalli

dblp:348/9680 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
1.622025
Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Metric · ICLR 2025
Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
gromov-wasserstein distance
0.912025
Linear Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Embedding · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.912025
Linear Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Embedding · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
barycenter
0.912025
Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Metric · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
gromov-wasserstein distance
0.912025
Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Metric · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport › wasserstein distance
sliced wasserstein distance
0.812024
Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2024
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching
0.312025
Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Metric · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal transport · 2.4frank-wolfe algorithm · 1.7stereographic projection · 1.5generalized radon transform · 1.5linearization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Linear Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Embedding
abstract
The Gromov–Wasserstein (GW) problem, a variant of the classical optimal transport (OT) problem, has attracted growing interest in the machine learning and data science communities due to its ability to quantify similarity between measures in different metric spaces. However, like the classical OT problem, GW imposes an equal mass constraint between measures, which restricts its application in many machine learning tasks. To address this limitation, the partial Gromov-Wasserstein (PGW) problem has been introduced. It relaxes the equal mass constraint, allowing the comparison of general positive Radon measures. Despite this, both GW and PGW face significant computational challenges due to their non-convex nature. To overcome these challenges, we propose the linear partial Gromov-Wasserstein (LPGW) embedding, a linearized embedding technique for the PGW problem. For $K$ different metric measure spaces, the pairwise computation of the PGW distance requires solving the PGW problem $\mathcal{O}(K^2)$ times. In contrast, the proposed linearization technique reduces this to $\mathcal{O}(K)$ times. Similar to the linearization technique for the classical OT problem, we prove that LPGW defines a valid metric for metric measure spaces. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of LPGW in practical applications such as shape retrieval and learning with transport-based embeddings, showing that LPGW preserves the advantages of PGW in partial matching while significantly enhancing computational efficiency. The code is available at https://github.com/mint-vu/Linearized_Partial_Gromov_Wasserstein.
Yikun Bai, Abihith Kothapalli, Hengrong Du, Rocio Diaz Martin, Soheil Kolouri
ICLR2
2025 Partial Gromov-Wasserstein Metric
abstract
The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance has gained increasing interest in the machine learning community in recent years, as it allows for the comparison of measures in different metric spaces. To overcome the limitations imposed by the equal mass requirements of the classical GW problem, researchers have begun exploring its application in unbalanced settings. However, Unbalanced GW (UGW) can only be regarded as a discrepancy rather than a rigorous metric/distance between two metric measure spaces (mm-spaces). In this paper, we propose a particular case of the UGW problem, termed Partial Gromov-Wasserstein (PGW). We establish that PGW is a well-defined metric between mm-spaces and discuss its theoretical properties, including the existence of a minimizer for the PGW problem and the relationship between PGW and GW, among others. We then propose two variants of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm for solving the PGW problem and show that they are mathematically and computationally equivalent. Moreover, based on our PGW metric, we introduce the analogous concept of barycenters for mm-spaces. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of our PGW metric and related solvers in applications such as shape matching, shape retrieval, and shape interpolation, comparing them against existing baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/mint-vu/PGW_Metric.
Yikun Bai, Rocio Diaz Martin, Abihith Kothapalli, Hengrong Du, Soheil Kolouri
ICLR3
2024 Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein Distances
abstract
Comparing spherical probability distributions is of great interest in various fields, including geology, medical domains, computer vision, and deep representation learning. The utility of optimal transport-based distances, such as the Wasserstein distance, for comparing probability measures has spurred active research in developing computationally efficient variations of these distances for spherical probability measures. This paper introduces a high-speed and highly parallelizable distance for comparing spherical measures using the stereographic projection and the generalized Radon transform, which we refer to as the Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein (S3W) distance. We carefully address the distance distortion caused by the stereographic projection and provide an extensive theoretical analysis of our proposed metric and its rotationally invariant variation. Finally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed metrics and compare them with recent baselines in terms of both speed and accuracy through a wide range of numerical studies, including gradient flows and self-supervised learning. Our code is available at https://github.com/mint-vu/s3wd.
Yikun Bai, Abihith Kothapalli, Ashkan Shahbazi, Rocio Diaz Martin, Soheil Kolouri
ICML3