Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ishaan Singh Rawal

dblp:349/4936 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 28% Vision and language · 28% Deep learning architectures and training · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
modality fusion
0.812024
Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal representation
0.812024
Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering
0.812024
Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212024
Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
representation probing
0.212024
Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-parametric probe · 0.8attention analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion
abstract
While VideoQA Transformer models demonstrate competitive performance on standard benchmarks, the reasons behind their success are not fully understood. Do these models capture the rich multimodal structures and dynamics from video and text jointly? Or are they achieving high scores by exploiting biases and spurious features? Hence, to provide insights, we design QUAG (QUadrant AveraGe), a lightweight and non-parametric probe, to conduct dataset-model combined representation analysis by impairing modality fusion. We find that the models achieve high performance on many datasets without leveraging multimodal representations. To validate QUAG further, we design QUAG-attention, a less-expressive replacement of self-attention with restricted token interactions. Models with QUAG-attention achieve similar performance with significantly fewer multiplication operations without any finetuning. Our findings raise doubts about the current models’ abilities to learn highly-coupled multimodal representations. Hence, we design the CLAVI (Complements in LAnguage and VIdeo) dataset, a stress-test dataset curated by augmenting real-world videos to have high modality coupling. Consistent with the findings of QUAG, we find that most of the models achieve near-trivial performance on CLAVI. This reasserts the limitations of current models for learning highly-coupled multimodal representations, that is not evaluated by the current datasets.
Ishaan Singh Rawal, Alexander Matyasko, Shantanu Jaiswal, Basura Fernando, Cheston Tan
ICML1