Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ishaan Singh Rawal
dblp:349/4936
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 28% Vision and language · 28% Deep learning architectures and training · 28% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
modality fusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
representation probing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
non-parametric probe · 0.8attention analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality FusionabstractWhile VideoQA Transformer models demonstrate competitive performance on standard benchmarks, the reasons behind their success are not fully understood. Do these models capture the rich multimodal structures and dynamics from video and text jointly? Or are they achieving high scores by exploiting biases and spurious features? Hence, to provide insights, we design QUAG (QUadrant AveraGe), a lightweight and non-parametric probe, to conduct dataset-model combined representation analysis by impairing modality fusion. We find that the models achieve high performance on many datasets without leveraging multimodal representations. To validate QUAG further, we design QUAG-attention, a less-expressive replacement of self-attention with restricted token interactions. Models with QUAG-attention achieve similar performance with significantly fewer multiplication operations without any finetuning. Our findings raise doubts about the current models’ abilities to learn highly-coupled multimodal representations. Hence, we design the CLAVI (Complements in LAnguage and VIdeo) dataset, a stress-test dataset curated by augmenting real-world videos to have high modality coupling. Consistent with the findings of QUAG, we find that most of the models achieve near-trivial performance on CLAVI. This reasserts the limitations of current models for learning highly-coupled multimodal representations, that is not evaluated by the current datasets. Ishaan Singh Rawal, Alexander Matyasko, Shantanu Jaiswal, Basura Fernando, Cheston Tan |
ICML | 1 |