Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael A. Perlin
dblp:349/5212 · also Michael Alexandrovich Perlin
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9316-1596ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 92% Performance modeling and evaluation · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum circuit simulation
circuit cutting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum Simulation · ISCA 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum circuit simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum Simulation · ISCA 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum Simulation · ISCA 2023 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum Simulation · ISCA 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum Simulation · ISCA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
clifford-based simulation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Quantum Circuit Cutting for Classical ShadowsabstractClassical shadow tomography is a sample-efficient technique for characterizing quantum systems and predicting many of their properties. Circuit cutting is a technique for dividing large quantum circuits into smaller fragments that can be executed more robustly using fewer quantum resources. We introduce a divide-and-conquer circuit cutting method for estimating the expectation values of observables using classical shadows. We derive a general formula for making predictions using the classical shadows of circuit fragments from arbitrarily cut circuits and provide the sample complexity analysis for the case when observables factorize across fragments. Then, we numerically show that our divide-and-conquer method outperforms traditional uncut shadow tomography when estimating high-weight observables that act non-trivially on many qubits and discuss the mechanisms for this advantage. Daniel Tzu Shiuan Chen, Zain H. Saleem, Michael A. Perlin |
ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. | 3 |
| 2023 | Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum SimulationabstractQuantum computing has potential to provide exponential speedups over classical computing for many important applications. However, today's quantum computers are in their early stages, and hardware quality issues hinder the scale of program execution. Benchmarking and simulation of quantum circuits on classical computers is therefore essential to advance the understanding of how quantum computers and programs operate, enabling both algorithm discovery that leads to high-impact quantum computation and engineering improvements that deliver to more powerful quantum systems. Unfortunately, the nature of quantum information causes simulation complexity to scale exponentially with problem size. Kaitlin N. Smith, Michael A. Perlin, Pranav Gokhale, Paige Frederick, David Owusu-Antwi, Richard Rines, Victory Omole, Fred Chong |
ISCA | 2 |