Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Naiyin Jin
dblp:349/5353
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-5552-469XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 67% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
accelerator offloading |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MESA: Microarchitecture Extensions for Spatial Architecture Generation · ISCA 2023 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
dynamic reconfiguration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MESA: Microarchitecture Extensions for Spatial Architecture Generation · ISCA 2023 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › spatial architecture
spatial accelerator |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MESA: Microarchitecture Extensions for Spatial Architecture Generation · ISCA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
instruction mapping · 0.7dataflow analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Mozart: Taming Taxes and Composing Accelerators with Shared-MemoryabstractResource-constrained system-on-chips (SoCs) are increasingly heterogeneous with specialized accelerators for various tasks. Acceleration taxes due to control and data movement, however, diminish end-to-end speedups from hardware acceleration. Meanwhile, emerging workloads are increasingly task-diverse with several, potentially shared, fine-grained acceleration candidates. This motivates a paradigm of parallel and disaggregated acceleration. Compared to a monolithic accelerator, disaggregation provides higher flexibility, reuse, and utilization, but at the cost of higher control and data acceleration taxes. Vignesh Suresh, Bakshree Mishra, Zeran Zhu, Naiyin Jin, Charles Block, Paolo Mantovani, Davide Giri, Joseph Zuckerman, Luca P. Carloni, Sarita V. Adve |
PACT | 5 |
| 2023 | MESA: Microarchitecture Extensions for Spatial Architecture GenerationabstractModern heterogeneous CPUs incorporate hardware accelerators to enable domain-specialized execution and achieve improved efficiency. A well-known class among them, spatial accelerators, are designed with reconfigurability to accelerate a wide range of compute-heavy and data-parallel applications. Unlike CPU cores, however, they tend to require specialized compilers and software stacks, libraries, or languages to operate and cannot be utilized with ease by all applications. As a result, the accelerator's large pool of compute and memory resources sit wastefully idle when it is not explicitly programmed. Our goal is to dismantle this CPU-accelerator barrier by monitoring CPU threads for acceleration opportunities during execution and, if viable, dynamically reconfigure the accelerator to allow transparent offloading. We develop MESA (Microarchitecture Extensions for Spatial Architecture Generation), a hardware block on the CPU that translates machine code to build an accelerator configuration specialized for the running program. While such a dynamic translation/reconfiguration approach is challenging, it has a key advantage over ahead-of-time compilers: access to runtime information, revealing not only dynamic dependencies but also performance characteristics. MESA maintains a real-time performance model of the program mapped on the accelerator in the form of a spatial dataflow graph with nodes weighted by operation latency and edges weighted by data transfer latency. Features of this dataflow graph are continuously updated with runtime information captured by performance counters, allowing a feedback loop of optimization, reconfiguration, and acceleration. This performance model allows MESA to identify the accelerator's critical paths and pinpoint its bottlenecks, upon which we implement in hardware a data-driven instruction mapping algorithm that locally minimizes latency. Backed by a synthesized RTL implementation, we evaluate the feasibility of our microarchitectural solution with different accelerator configurations. Across the Rodinia benchmarks, results demonstrate an average 1.3× speedup in performance and 1.8× gain in energy efficiency against a multicore CPU baseline. Dong Kai Wang, Jiaqi Lou, Naiyin Jin, Edwin Mascarenhas, Rohan Mahapatra, Sean Kinzer, Soroush Ghodrati, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, Hadi Esmaeilzadeh, Nam Sung Kim |
ISCA | 3 |