EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arno Verduyn
dblp:349/8505
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5073-3881ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 31% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27% Robot manipulation · 26% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion segmentation
rigid motion segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing motion trajectory segmentation of rigid bodies using a novel screw-based trajectory-shape representation · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing motion trajectory segmentation of rigid bodies using a novel screw-based trajectory-shape representation · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion analysis › trajectory analysis
trajectory segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing motion trajectory segmentation of rigid bodies using a novel screw-based trajectory-shape representation · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
constrained motion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Invariant Descriptors of Motion and Force Trajectories for Interpreting Object Manipulation Tasks in Contact · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Invariant Descriptors of Motion and Force Trajectories for Interpreting Object Manipulation Tasks in Contact · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
task representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Invariant Descriptors of Motion and Force Trajectories for Interpreting Object Manipulation Tasks in Contact · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing motion trajectory segmentation of rigid bodies using a novel screw-based trajectory-shape representation · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
contact task |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Invariant Descriptors of Motion and Force Trajectories for Interpreting Object Manipulation Tasks in Contact · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › manipulation control
contour following |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Invariant Descriptors of Motion and Force Trajectories for Interpreting Object Manipulation Tasks in Contact · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
screw theory · 1.4self-supervised segmentation · 0.8optimal control · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Enhancing motion trajectory segmentation of rigid bodies using a novel screw-based trajectory-shape representationabstractTrajectory segmentation refers to dividing a trajectory into meaningful consecutive sub-trajectories. This paper focuses on trajectory segmentation for 3D rigid-body motions. Most segmentation approaches in the literature represent the body’s trajectory as a point trajectory, considering only its translation and neglecting its rotation. We propose a novel trajectory representation for rigid-body motions that incorporates both translation and rotation, and additionally exhibits several invariant properties. This representation consists of a geometric progress rate and a third-order trajectory-shape descriptor. Concepts from screw theory were used to make this representation time-invariant and also invariant to the choice of body reference point. This new representation is validated for a self-supervised segmentation approach, both in simulation and using real recordings of human-demonstrated pouring motions. The results show a more robust detection of consecutive sub-motions with distinct features and a more consistent segmentation compared to conventional representations. We believe that other existing segmentation methods may benefit from using this trajectory representation to improve their invariance. Arno Verduyn, Maxim Vochten, Joris De Schutter |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2023 | Invariant Descriptors of Motion and Force Trajectories for Interpreting Object Manipulation Tasks in ContactabstractInvariant descriptors of point and rigid-body motion trajectories have been proposed in the past as representative task models for motion recognition and generalization. Currently, no invariant descriptor exists for representing force trajectories, which appear in contact tasks. This article introduces invariant descriptors for force trajectories by exploiting the duality between motion and force. Two types of invariant descriptors are presented depending on whether the trajectories consist of screw or vector coordinates. Methods and software are provided for robustly calculating the invariant descriptors from noisy measurements using optimal control. Using experimental human demonstrations of 3-D contour following and peg-on-hole alignment tasks, invariant descriptors are shown to result in task representations that do not depend on the calibration of reference frames or sensor locations. The tuning process for the optimal control problems is shown to be fast and intuitive. Similar to motions in free space, the proposed invariant descriptors for motion and force trajectories may prove useful for the recognition and generalization of constrained motions, such as during object manipulation in contact. Maxim Vochten, Ali Mousavi Mohammadi, Arno Verduyn, Tinne De Laet, Erwin Aertbeliën, Joris De Schutter |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |