Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Schütte

dblp:349/8751 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3126-4626ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 50% Autonomous driving · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
0.812024
LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › point cloud object detection
LiDAR-based 3D object detection
0.812024
LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.812024
LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › radar perception
radar object detection
0.812024
LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Learned Non-Maximum Suppression for 3D Object Detection
Timo Osterburg, Stefan Schütte, Torsten Bertram
IV2
2025 Learning Explicit Uncertainty Estimation in Cross Modality Localization
abstract
Metric localization of automated vehicles using exteroceptive sensors involves finding reliable spatial features in both the sensor data and the map. In real world scenarios, methods have to deal with unknown and changing environments and noisy sensor measurements, making feature selection considerably harder. If the map is created using a different sensor modality, localization methods also have to deal with the characteristics of the available sensor. Machine learning methods promise a solution to these problems by extracting the same features from maps created from different sensors. In this work, we compare an approach for learning based cross modality localization with a classical method on different types of maps. Furthermore, we enhance the learned model by estimating its uncertainty directly from the measurement data.
Stefan Schütte, Torsten Bertram
IV1
2024 LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection
Patrick Palmer, Martin Krüger, Stefan Schütte, Richard Altendorfer, Ganesh Adam, Torsten Bertram
ECCV (60)3