EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sam Bala Daram
dblp:35/10968
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › design automation tools
VLSI CAD |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | Position statement - CAD for VLSI · DAC 1980 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
layout automation |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | Position statement - CAD for VLSI · DAC 1980 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | Position statement - CAD for VLSIabstractVLSI has become a glamorous buzz-word, and much talk has centered on evolutionary and revolutionary solutions to the Computer Aided Design of VLSI circuits. Not being altogether cynical, one may venture to say that CAD for LSI enjoyed a priviledged position in the last decade, and perhaps still does. While CAD for LSI was still being discussed and written about, and while CAD experts attempted to solve the much talked about layout problem by offering, to an interconnect-capacitance limited technology, solutions such as standard cells and automated routing, the industry went ahead and solved the same problem by giving computer aids to manual layout techniques, through the introduction of turnkey graphic systems. In proposing new solutions, it is important to understand the role played by turnkey graphics in LSI production. Sam Bala Daram |
DAC | 1 |