Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sam Liang
dblp:35/1109
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Transport protocols and congestion control · 61% Internet architecture and protocols · 30% Content delivery and video streaming · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols › multicast
reliable multicast |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | TCP-SMO: Extending TCP to Support Medium-Scale Multicast Applications · INFOCOM 2002 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › TCP
TCP extensions |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | TCP-SMO: Extending TCP to Support Medium-Scale Multicast Applications · INFOCOM 2002 |
Content delivery and video streaming › video multicast
real-time video multicast |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | TCP-SMO: Extending TCP to Support Medium-Scale Multicast Applications · INFOCOM 2002 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | TCP-SMO: Extending TCP to Support Medium-Scale Multicast ApplicationsabstractScalable reliable multicast protocols have been the focus of recent research, tackling the problem of efficient reliable data delivery to an arbitrarily large number of receivers. Yet, the common applications of multicast, such as multi-point file delivery, or video streaming from a media server, typically only involve a moderate number of receivers, such as a thousand or fewer. Moreover, because of the limited deployment of these specialized multicast protocols, it is common, when feasible, for applications to use multiple TCP connections instead, one for each receiver, to implement multi-point delivery, causing a significant demand on the transmission server and the downstream links. We describe a multicast extension to TCP, called single-source multicast optimization (SMO), that optimizes this case of multipoint delivery, providing the benefits of multicast together with the familiar features and API of TCP. Our results from experiments based on a Linux implementation and performed on a testbed show that TCP-SMO requires just a modest extension to the TCP implementation and provides scalable performance of multicast up to over a thousand receivers, thereby satisfying the common case requirements. In addition, used with TCP-RTM (real-time mode), TCP-SMO also supports real-time multimedia multicast applications well. Sam Liang, David R. Cheriton |
INFOCOM | 1 |