Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Müller 0003

dblp:35/1768-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0003-1250-118XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 8 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
proof complexity
0.322012
Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas · LICS 2012
Proof systems that take advice · Inf. Comput. 2011
Computational complexity › proof complexity
propositional proof systems
0.112012
Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas · LICS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weak arithmetic formalization · 0.1translation to propositional proofs · 0.1spectral techniques · 0.1proof complexity · 0.1advice · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Short propositional refutations for dense random 3CNF formulas
Sebastian Müller 0003, Iddo Tzameret
Ann. Pure Appl. Log.1
2012 Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas
abstract
Random 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notable are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with Ω(n1.5-ε) clauses (Chvatal and Szemeredi [13], Ben-Sasson and Wigderson [9]). On the other hand, the only known non-trivial upper bound on the size of random 3CNF refutations in a non-abstract propositional proof system is for resolution with Ω(n2/ log n) clauses, shown by Beame et al. [5]. In this paper we show that already standard propositional proof systems, within the hierarchy of Frege proofs, admit short refutations for random 3CNF formulas, for sufficiently large clause-to-variable ratio. Specifically, we demonstrate polynomialsize propositional refutations whose lines are TC0formulas (i.e., TC0-Frege proofs) for random 3CNF formulas with n variables and Ω(n1.4) clauses. The idea is based on demonstrating efficient propositional correctness proofs of the random 3CNF unsatisfiability witnesses given by Feige, Kim and Ofek [19]. Since the soundness of these witnesses is verified using spectral techniques, we develop an appropriate way to reason about eigenvectors in propositional systems. To carry out the full argument we work inside weak formal systems of arithmetic and use a general translation scheme to propositional proofs.
Sebastian Müller 0003, Iddo Tzameret
LICS1
2011 Proof systems that take advice
Olaf Beyersdorff, Johannes Köbler, Sebastian Müller 0003
Inf. Comput.3
2010 Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic
Olaf Beyersdorff, Arne Meier, Sebastian Müller 0003, Michael Thomas 0001, Heribert Vollmer
SAT3
2010 Different Approaches to Proof Systems
Olaf Beyersdorff, Sebastian Müller 0003
TAMC2
2010 A tight Karp-Lipton collapse result in bounded arithmetic
abstract
Cook and Krajíček have recently obtained the following Karp-Lipton collapse result in bounded arithmetic: if the theory PV proves NP⊆ P/ poly , then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to the Boolean hierarchy, and this collapse is provable in PV . Here we show the converse implication, thus answering an open question posed by Cook and Krajíček. We obtain this result by formalizing in PV a hard/easy argument of Buhrman et al. [2003]. In addition, we continue the investigation of propositional proof systems using advice, initiated by Cook and Krajíček. In particular, we obtain several optimality results for proof systems using advice. We further show that these optimal systems are equivalent to natural extensions of Frege systems.
Olaf Beyersdorff, Sebastian Müller 0003
ACM Trans. Comput. Log.2
2009 Nondeterministic Instance Complexity and Proof Systems with Advice
Olaf Beyersdorff, Johannes Köbler, Sebastian Müller 0003
LATA3
2009 Does Advice Help to Prove Propositional Tautologies?
Olaf Beyersdorff, Sebastian Müller 0003
SAT2