Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Müller 0003
dblp:35/1768-3
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0003-1250-118XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 8 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
proof complexity |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas · LICS 2012 Proof systems that take advice · Inf. Comput. 2011 |
Computational complexity › proof complexity
propositional proof systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas · LICS 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weak arithmetic formalization · 0.1translation to propositional proofs · 0.1spectral techniques · 0.1proof complexity · 0.1advice · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Short propositional refutations for dense random 3CNF formulas
Sebastian Müller 0003, Iddo Tzameret |
Ann. Pure Appl. Log. | 1 |
| 2012 | Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF FormulasabstractRandom 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notable are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with Ω(n1.5-ε) clauses (Chvatal and Szemeredi [13], Ben-Sasson and Wigderson [9]). On the other hand, the only known non-trivial upper bound on the size of random 3CNF refutations in a non-abstract propositional proof system is for resolution with Ω(n2/ log n) clauses, shown by Beame et al. [5]. In this paper we show that already standard propositional proof systems, within the hierarchy of Frege proofs, admit short refutations for random 3CNF formulas, for sufficiently large clause-to-variable ratio. Specifically, we demonstrate polynomialsize propositional refutations whose lines are TC0formulas (i.e., TC0-Frege proofs) for random 3CNF formulas with n variables and Ω(n1.4) clauses. The idea is based on demonstrating efficient propositional correctness proofs of the random 3CNF unsatisfiability witnesses given by Feige, Kim and Ofek [19]. Since the soundness of these witnesses is verified using spectral techniques, we develop an appropriate way to reason about eigenvectors in propositional systems. To carry out the full argument we work inside weak formal systems of arithmetic and use a general translation scheme to propositional proofs. Sebastian Müller 0003, Iddo Tzameret |
LICS | 1 |
| 2011 | Proof systems that take advice
Olaf Beyersdorff, Johannes Köbler, Sebastian Müller 0003 |
Inf. Comput. | 3 |
| 2010 | Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic
Olaf Beyersdorff, Arne Meier, Sebastian Müller 0003, Michael Thomas 0001, Heribert Vollmer |
SAT | 3 |
| 2010 | Different Approaches to Proof Systems
Olaf Beyersdorff, Sebastian Müller 0003 |
TAMC | 2 |
| 2010 | A tight Karp-Lipton collapse result in bounded arithmeticabstractCook and Krajíček have recently obtained the following Karp-Lipton collapse result in bounded arithmetic: if the theory PV proves NP⊆ P/ poly , then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to the Boolean hierarchy, and this collapse is provable in PV . Here we show the converse implication, thus answering an open question posed by Cook and Krajíček. We obtain this result by formalizing in PV a hard/easy argument of Buhrman et al. [2003]. In addition, we continue the investigation of propositional proof systems using advice, initiated by Cook and Krajíček. In particular, we obtain several optimality results for proof systems using advice. We further show that these optimal systems are equivalent to natural extensions of Frege systems. Olaf Beyersdorff, Sebastian Müller 0003 |
ACM Trans. Comput. Log. | 2 |
| 2009 | Nondeterministic Instance Complexity and Proof Systems with Advice
Olaf Beyersdorff, Johannes Köbler, Sebastian Müller 0003 |
LATA | 3 |
| 2009 | Does Advice Help to Prove Propositional Tautologies?
Olaf Beyersdorff, Sebastian Müller 0003 |
SAT | 2 |