Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Drake

dblp:35/2390 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 64% Learning theory · 24% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 12%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
frequency-domain learning
0.122009
Search Techniques for Fourier-Based Learning · IJCAI 2009
A practical generalization of Fourier-based learning · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory
0.112005
A practical generalization of Fourier-based learning · ICML 2005
Mathematical optimization › approximation theory
function approximation
0.112005
A practical generalization of Fourier-based learning · ICML 2005
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms
0.112005
A practical generalization of Fourier-based learning · ICML 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

correlation search · 0.1fourier representations · 0.1fourier representation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Improving Spectral Learning by Using Multiple Representations
abstract
Spectral learning algorithms learn an unknown function by learning a spectral (e.g., Fourier) representation of the function. However, there are many possible spectral representations, none of which will be best in all situations. Consequently, it seems natural to consider how a spectral learner could make use of multiple representations when learning. This paper proposes and compares three approaches to learning from multiple spectral representations. Empirical results suggest that an ensemble approach to multi-spectrum learning, in which spectral models are learned independently in each of a set of candidate representations and then combined in a majority-vote ensemble, works best in practice.
Adam Drake, Dan Ventura
ICMLA1
2014 Using Spectral Features to Improve Sentiment Analysis
abstract
A common approach to sentiment classification is to identify a set of sentiment-carrying words and then to use machine learning to build a classifier that can classify sentiment based on the presence/absence of those words. In this paper, we propose a Fourier-based extension of this approach. Specifically, we introduce a spectral learning algorithm that implicitly identifies sentiment-carrying words and higher-order functions of those words as it learns to assign real-valued sentiment scores to documents. The spectral learner extends the word presence model by applying Boolean logic operators (AND, OR, and XOR) to the word presence features to identify useful higher-order features. These spectral features can be used in other learning algorithms, and we show how the performance of other learning algorithms can be improved by these features. Finally, we consider the problem of determining which of a pair of reviews expresses more positive overall sentiment, and we show that the spectral learner can identify very small distinctions in sentiment with better-than-random accuracy, while larger distinctions can be correctly identified with high accuracy.
Adam Drake, Dan Ventura
ICMLA1
2013 An Empirical Comparison of Spectral Learning Methods for Classification
abstract
In this paper, we explore the problem of how to learn spectral (e.g., Fourier) models for classification problems. Specifically, we consider two sub-problems of spectral learning: (1) how to select the basis functions that will be included in the model and (2) how to assign coefficients to the selected basis functions. Interestingly, empirical results suggest that the most commonly used approach does not perform as well in practice as other approaches, while a method for assigning coefficients based on finding an optimal linear combination of low-order basis functions usually outperforms other approaches.
Adam Drake, Dan Ventura
ICMLA (1)1
2009 Search Techniques for Fourier-Based Learning
Adam Drake, Dan Ventura
IJCAI1
2005 A practical generalization of Fourier-based learning
abstract
This paper presents a search algorithm for finding functions that are highly correlated with an arbitrary set of data. The functions found by the search can be used to approximate the unknown function that generated the data. A special case of this approach is a method for learning Fourier representations. Empirical results demonstrate that on typical real-world problems the most highly correlated functions can be found very quickly, while combinations of these functions provide good approximations of the unknown function.
Adam Drake, Dan Ventura
ICML1