Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James R. Russell

dblp:35/2544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 62% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 33% Automata and formal languages · 5%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
dataflow semantics
0.011990
On Oraclizable Networks and Kahn's Principle · POPL 1990
Programming languages and type systems › program equivalence
full abstraction
0.011990
On Oraclizable Networks and Kahn's Principle · POPL 1990
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics
0.011990
On Oraclizable Networks and Kahn's Principle · POPL 1990
Logic in computer science › proof theory
constructive proof
0.011990
A Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma · LICS 1990
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › combinatorics on words
higman's lemma
0.011990
A Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma · LICS 1990
Logic in computer science
proof theory
0.011990
A Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma · LICS 1990
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › partial orders
well-quasi-ordering
0.011990
A Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma · LICS 1990
Logic in computer science › concurrency theory
concurrency semantics
0.011989
Full Abstraction for Nondeterministic Dataflow Networks · FOCS 1989
Logic in computer science › semantics › denotational semantics
full abstraction
0.011989
Full Abstraction for Nondeterministic Dataflow Networks · FOCS 1989
Automata and formal languages › regular languages
regular expressions
0.011990
A Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma · LICS 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

induction · 0.0fixed-point semantics · 0.0domain theory · 0.0constructive proof · 0.0trace semantics · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Concert/C: Supporting Distributed Programming with Language Extensions and a Portable Multiprotocol Runtime
abstract
We describe the design and implementation of the Concert/C compiler and runtime. We describe solutions to the problems of (1) how to extend a language without compromising the use of legacy source and object code and tools, (2) how to extract language-neutral interface information from native language type declarations, (3) how to make function pointers into first-class values transmissable over a network while retaining runtime compatibility with plain C, and (4) how to interoperate with multiple RPC and messaging protocols, selecting protocols at runtime, with little sacrifice of efficiency.>
Joshua S. Auerbach, Ajei S. Gopal, Mark T. Kennedy, James R. Russell
ICDCS4
1991 Optimistic Failure Recovery for Very Large Networks
abstract
Optimistic failure recovery mechanisms are proposed as a way to provide transparent fault tolerance to distributed applications and systems. The authors identify problems that may arise when these mechanisms are applied to vast networks including many processors and spanning large geographical areas and many administrative domains. They present a technique-recovery unit gateways-that can be used to address many of these issues with existing failure recovery algorithms. This method can be applied with minimal disruption to existing transparent recovery systems, as well as to build large optimistic recovery systems while minimizing the dependency tracking overhead.>
Andy Lowry, James R. Russell, Arthur P. Goldberg
SRDS2
1990 A Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma
abstract
G. Higman's lemma (1952) is a special case of the more general Kruskal's tree embedding theorem and the graph minor theorem. A direct constructive proof of the lemma with manifest computational content is presented. This is done by reducing the problem to a construction of certain sets of sequential regular expressions. A well-founded order on such sets is exhibited, and the lemma then follows by induction.>
Chetan R. Murthy, James R. Russell
LICS2
1990 On Oraclizable Networks and Kahn's Principle
abstract
In this paper we investigate generalizations of Kahn's principle to nondeterministic dataflow networks. Specifically, we show that for the class of "oraclizable" networks a semantic model in which networks are represented by certain sets of continuous functions is fully abstract and has the fixed-point property. We go on to show that the oraclizable networks are the largest class representable by this model, and are a proper superclass of the networks implementable with the infinity fair merge primitive. Finally, we use this characterization to show that infinity fair merge networks and oraclizable networks are proper subclasses of the networks with Egli-Milner monotone input-output relations.
James R. Russell
POPL1
1989 Full Abstraction for Nondeterministic Dataflow Networks
abstract
The problem of finding fully abstract semantic models for nondeterministic dataflow networks is discussed. The author presents a result indicating that there exist nondeterministic networks using only bounded choice for which the input-output relation is not compositional. It is shown that the trace semantics is fully abstract for all nondeterministic as well as deterministic networks.>
James R. Russell
FOCS1