Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yoshihisa Hiyama

dblp:35/268 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.012004
Semi-autonomous Reconfiguration of Wheeled Mobile Robots in Coordination · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Robot manipulation › mobile manipulation
multiple mobile manipulators
0.012004
Semi-autonomous Reconfiguration of Wheeled Mobile Robots in Coordination · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision avoidance
0.012004
Semi-autonomous Reconfiguration of Wheeled Mobile Robots in Coordination · ICRA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0manipulability measure · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Semi-autonomous Reconfiguration of Wheeled Mobile Robots in Coordination
abstract
This paper investigates multiple wheeled mobile manipulators coordinating with each other for a common task such as transporting a common object. In our previous work we derived kinematic and dynamic manipulability measures for multiple mobile manipulators transporting a common object and also developed a simulation environment. The main objective of this paper is to conduct experiments with two different real robot systems, arm-type and table-type, and compare them with simulation results. Collision avoidance is also considered, in which they maneuver to avoid a collision while maintaining support for the object.
Yoshio Yamamoto, Yoshihisa Hiyama, Akira Fujita
ICRA2