Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Gérard Roucairol

dblp:35/273 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Distributed computing theory · 65% Logic in computer science · 35%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control
serializability
0.011982
On Serializability of Iterated Transactions · PODC 1982
Transaction processing and concurrency control
transaction models
0.011982
On Serializability of Iterated Transactions · PODC 1982
Distributed computing theory › distributed algorithms
distributed algorithm correctness
0.011982
On the Distribution of an Assertion · PODC 1982
Logic in computer science › category theory
galois connections
0.011982
On the Distribution of an Assertion · PODC 1982
Distributed systems › distributed database
commit protocol
0.011981
The Two-Step Commitment Protocol: Modeling, Specification and Proof Methodology · ICSE 1981
Distributed systems
consensus
0.011981
The Two-Step Commitment Protocol: Modeling, Specification and Proof Methodology · ICSE 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proof methodology · 0.0formal specification · 0.0serializability theory · 0.0lattice theory · 0.0galois connection · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 A Fully Distributed (Minimal) Spanning Tree Algorithm
Ivan Lavallée, Gérard Roucairol
Inf. Process. Lett.2
1985 A language theoretic approach to serialization problem in concurrent systems
Marie-Paule Flé, Gérard Roucairol
FCT2
1985 Petri Nets and Algebraic Calculi of Processes
Gérard Boudol, Gérard Roucairol, Robert de Simone
STACS2
1985 Maximal Serializability of Iterated Transactions
Marie-Paule Flé, Gérard Roucairol
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
1984 Multiserialization of Iterated Transactions
Marie-Paule Flé, Gérard Roucairol
Inf. Process. Lett.2
1982 On the Distribution of an Assertion
abstract
Given an n-nodes network and an assertion G expressing its correctness, it is shown that G can be decomposed into collection of n local assertions and n.(n-1) “communication” assertions. The special case of a 2-nodes network is first examined, and it is shown how the notion of Galois connections in lattice theory is a basic tool for the assertion decomposition. The principles of a communication protocol that allow to maintain the resulting assertions are described. For the n-nodes network it is shown that assertion G induces Galois connections between any two parts of the network. General formulae for the local and communication assertions are found using this fact. It is also shown that the communication assertions do involve only a pair of nodes each one, which makes possible the use of techniques taken from the 2-nodes network for their maintenance. As an application example a distributed algorithm to solve the “2-out-of-3” problem is proposed.
Osvaldo Carvalho, Gérard Roucairol
PODC2
1982 On Serializability of Iterated Transactions
abstract
In the literature on serializability (see [1]), a transaction is considered to be a finite sequence of operations. As a step towards the handling of more complex evolutions of processes, we assume in this paper that the sequence of operations performed by a transaction may be infinitely often repeated as for instance, might behave a pre-existing service process in an operating system. (Remark that the classical “critical section” problem can be viewed as a particular case of the serializability problem). Therefore, a behaviour of a system of transactions will be understood herein as an infinite behaviour.
Marie-Paule Flé, Gérard Roucairol
PODC2
1981 The Two-Step Commitment Protocol: Modeling, Specification and Proof Methodology
Jean-Loup Baer, Georges Gardarin, Claude Girault, Gérard Roucairol
ICSE4
1976 Reduction of Petri-Nets
Gérard Berthelot, Gérard Roucairol
MFCS2