EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ferdinand Vollei
dblp:35/2872
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Requirements engineering and software design · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
software inspection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Determining Inspection Cost-Effectiveness by Combining Project Data and Expert Opinion · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process measurement |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Determining Inspection Cost-Effectiveness by Combining Project Data and Expert Opinion · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expert opinion elicitation · 0.1bayesian estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Determining Inspection Cost-Effectiveness by Combining Project Data and Expert OpinionabstractThere is a general agreement among software engineering practitioners that software inspections are an important technique to achieve high software quality at a reasonable cost. However, there are many ways to perform such inspections and many factors that affect their cost-effectiveness. It is therefore important to be able to estimate this cost-effectiveness in order to monitor it, improve it, and convince developers and management that the technology and related investments are worth while. This work proposes a rigorous but practical way to do so. In particular, a meaningful model to measure cost-effectiveness is proposed and a method to determine cost-effectiveness by combining project data and expert opinion is described. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, the results of a large-scale industrial case study are presented and an initial validation is performed. Bernd G. Freimut, Lionel C. Briand, Ferdinand Vollei |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |
| 2004 | Using multiple adaptive regression splines to support decision making in code inspections
Lionel C. Briand, Bernd G. Freimut, Ferdinand Vollei |
J. Syst. Softw. | 3 |
| 2000 | Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Inspections by Combining Project Data and Expert OpinionabstractThere is a general agreement among software engineering practitioners that sofware inspections are an important technique to achieve high software quality at a reasonable cost. However, there are many ways to perform such inspections and many factors that affect their cost-effectiveness. It is therefore important to be able to estimate this cost-effectiveness in order to monitor it, improve it, and convince developers and management that the technology and related investments are worthwhile. This work proposes a rigorous but practical way to do so. In particular, a meaningful model to measure cost-effectiveness is selected and a method to determine the cost-effectiveness by combining project data and expert opinion is proposed. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, the results of a large-scale industrial case study are presented. Lionel C. Briand, Bernd G. Freimut, Ferdinand Vollei |
ISSRE | 3 |