Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chris Riley

dblp:35/2892 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0001-7433-0406ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 70% Storage systems · 30%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 50% Systems and software security · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
auditing
0.112006
Survivable Monitoring in Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2006
Network security › network measurement › network monitoring
traffic monitoring
0.112006
Survivable Monitoring in Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2006
Distributed systems › observability
distributed monitoring
0.112006
Survivable Monitoring in Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2006
Distributed systems
dynamic network
0.112006
Survivable Monitoring in Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2006
Storage systems › storage architecture
persistent storage
0.112006
Survivable Monitoring in Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2006
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012006
Survivable Monitoring in Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online competitive analysis · 0.1distributed load balancing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Biometrics in Practice: What Does HCI Have to Say?
Lynne M. Coventry, Graham I. Johnson, Tom McEwan, Chris Riley
INTERACT (2)4
2009 Instruction, Feedback and Biometrics: The User Interface for Fingerprint Authentication Systems
Chris Riley, Graham Johnson, Heather McCracken, Ahmed Al-Saffar
INTERACT (2)1
2006 Survivable Monitoring in Dynamic Networks
abstract
We present a monitoring system for a dynamic network in which a set of domain nodes shares the responsibility for producing and storing monitoring information about a set of visitors. This information is stored persistently when the set of domain nodes grows and shrinks. Such a system can be used to store traffic or other logs for auditing or can be used as a subroutine for many applications to allow significant increases in functionality and reliability. The features of our system include authenticating visitors, monitoring their traffic through the domain, and storing this information in a persistent, efficient, and searchable manner. The storage process is O(log n)-competitive in the number of network messages with respect to an optimal offline algorithm; we show that this is as good as any online algorithm can achieve and significantly better than many commonly used strategies for distributed load balancing
Giuseppe Ateniese, Chris Riley, Christian Scheideler
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.2
2004 A Distributed Hash Table for Computational Grids
abstract
Summary form only given. We present and analyze a distributed hash table-based supervised peer-to-peer system that allows an even distribution of and efficient lookup for objects (e.g. data or tasks) stored in the system. A supervised peer-to-peer system is a system that is formed by a supervisor but in which all other activities can be performed on a peer-to-peer basis without involving the supervisor. Our system has average constant degree and can distribute objects evenly among the peers up to a constant factor in expectation. The supervised peer-to-peer approach makes the system particularly useful for computational grids. As an example, we discuss the use of our structure for recursively defined algorithms such as dynamic programming and distributed tree searches, and practical problems such as Web crawling; our structure distributes tasks randomly and prevents repeated computations to optimize parallel efficiency.
Chris Riley, Christian Scheideler
IPDPS1
2004 Pagoda: a dynamic overlay network for routing, data management, and multicasting
abstract
The tremendous growth of public interest in peer-to-peer systems in recent years has initiated a lot of research work on how to design efficient and robust overlay networks for these systems. While a large collection of scalable peer-to-peer overlay networks has been proposed in recent years, many fundamental questions have remained open. Some of these are:
Ankur Bhargava, Kishore Kothapalli, Chris Riley, Christian Scheideler, Mark Thober
SPAA3
2003 Drawing Graphs with Large Vertices and Thick Edges
Gill Barequet, Michael T. Goodrich, Chris Riley
WADS3