Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Venkat Krishnaswamy
dblp:35/5177
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential equivalence checking |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007 Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checking · DAC 2006 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
simulation-based verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checking · DAC 2006 |
Electronic design automation
system-level simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007 |
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checking · DAC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal verification · 0.1RTL verification · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Directional Kernel Density Estimation for Classification of Breast Tissue SpectraabstractIn Breast Conserving Therapy, surgeons measure the thickness of healthy tissue surrounding an excised tumor (surgical margin) via post-operative histological or visual assessment tests that, for lack of enough standardization and reliability, have recurrence rates in the order of 33%. Spectroscopic interrogation of these margins is possible during surgery, but algorithms are needed for parametric or dimension reduction processing. One methodology for tumor discrimination based on dimensionality reduction and nonparametric estimation-in particular, Directional Kernel Density Estimation-is proposed and tested on spectral image data from breast samples. Once a hyperspectral image of the tumor has been captured, a surgeon assists by establishing Regions of Interest where tissues are qualitatively differentiable. After proper normalization, Directional KDE is used to estimate the likelihood of every pixel in the image belonging to each specified tissue class. This information is enough to yield, in almost real time and with 98% accuracy, results that coincide with those provided by histological H&E validation performed after the surgery. Arturo Pardo, Eusebio Real, Venkat Krishnaswamy, Jose M. Lopez-Higuera, Brian W. Pogue, Olga M. Conde |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 3 |
| 2007 | Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTLabstractIt has long been the practice to create models in C or C++ for architectural studies, software prototyping and RTL verification in the design of Systems-on-Chip (SoC). It is often the case that by the end of a design project, multiple C models exist for different uses. Clearly, this leads to wasted effort on the part of model developers, and creates risk of functional divergence across models. In this paper we present some guidelines for system-level modeling and RTL design to allow for efficiently leveraging the system-level model for RTL verification via simulation based techniques, as well as via sequential equivalence checking. The paper presents the challenges of keeping system-level models and RTL synchronized from a functional perspective and presents some techniques for overcoming these challenges. Anmol Mathur, Venkat Krishnaswamy |
DAC | 2 |
| 2006 | Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checkingabstractIt has long been the practice to create models in C or C++ for architectural studies, software prototyping and RTL verification in the design of Systems-on-Chip (SoC). These models are written in C++ primarily because it is possible to achieve very high simulation speeds, but also because it is productive to code at high levels of abstraction. In this paper we present a modeling methodology that continues to exploit the inherent advantages of writing models in C++ while ensuring that they are usable for formal verification of RTL through the use of sequential equivalence checking technology. An industrial case study is presented to show the validity of the approach. Philippe Georgelin, Venkat Krishnaswamy |
DAC | 2 |