Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Venkat Krishnaswamy

dblp:35/5177 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential equivalence checking
0.122007
Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007
Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checking · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking
0.112007
Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112007
Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
simulation-based verification
0.112007
Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.112006
Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checking · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation
system-level simulation
0.012007
Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL · DAC 2007
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.012006
Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checking · DAC 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal verification · 0.1RTL verification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Directional Kernel Density Estimation for Classification of Breast Tissue Spectra
abstract
In Breast Conserving Therapy, surgeons measure the thickness of healthy tissue surrounding an excised tumor (surgical margin) via post-operative histological or visual assessment tests that, for lack of enough standardization and reliability, have recurrence rates in the order of 33%. Spectroscopic interrogation of these margins is possible during surgery, but algorithms are needed for parametric or dimension reduction processing. One methodology for tumor discrimination based on dimensionality reduction and nonparametric estimation-in particular, Directional Kernel Density Estimation-is proposed and tested on spectral image data from breast samples. Once a hyperspectral image of the tumor has been captured, a surgeon assists by establishing Regions of Interest where tissues are qualitatively differentiable. After proper normalization, Directional KDE is used to estimate the likelihood of every pixel in the image belonging to each specified tissue class. This information is enough to yield, in almost real time and with 98% accuracy, results that coincide with those provided by histological H&E validation performed after the surgery.
Arturo Pardo, Eusebio Real, Venkat Krishnaswamy, Jose M. Lopez-Higuera, Brian W. Pogue, Olga M. Conde
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging3
2007 Design for Verification in System-level Models and RTL
abstract
It has long been the practice to create models in C or C++ for architectural studies, software prototyping and RTL verification in the design of Systems-on-Chip (SoC). It is often the case that by the end of a design project, multiple C models exist for different uses. Clearly, this leads to wasted effort on the part of model developers, and creates risk of functional divergence across models. In this paper we present some guidelines for system-level modeling and RTL design to allow for efficiently leveraging the system-level model for RTL verification via simulation based techniques, as well as via sequential equivalence checking. The paper presents the challenges of keeping system-level models and RTL synchronized from a functional perspective and presents some techniques for overcoming these challenges.
Anmol Mathur, Venkat Krishnaswamy
DAC2
2006 Towards a C++-based design methodology facilitating sequential equivalence checking
abstract
It has long been the practice to create models in C or C++ for architectural studies, software prototyping and RTL verification in the design of Systems-on-Chip (SoC). These models are written in C++ primarily because it is possible to achieve very high simulation speeds, but also because it is productive to code at high levels of abstraction. In this paper we present a modeling methodology that continues to exploit the inherent advantages of writing models in C++ while ensuring that they are usable for formal verification of RTL through the use of sequential equivalence checking technology. An industrial case study is presented to show the validity of the approach.
Philippe Georgelin, Venkat Krishnaswamy
DAC2