Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Judith A. Blake
dblp:35/5736
· DBLP profile ↗
28ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-8522-334XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 26 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
pathway database |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Reactome and the Gene Ontology: digital convergence of data resources · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gearing up to handle the mosaic nature of life in the quest for orthologs · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics › orthology analysis
ortholog identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gearing up to handle the mosaic nature of life in the quest for orthologs · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology › biomedical ontology
gene ontology |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Ontology development for biological systems: immunology · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
ontology |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Ontology development for biological systems: immunology · Bioinform. 2007 |
Data integration and cleaning › scientific data integration
biological data integration |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | From Sipping on a Straw to Drinking from a Fire Hose: Data Integration in a Public Genome Database · ICDE 2004 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Ontology development for biological systems: immunology · Bioinform. 2007 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Reactome and the Gene Ontology: digital convergence of data resourcesabstractMOTIVATION: Gene Ontology Causal Activity Models (GO-CAMs) assemble individual associations of gene products with cellular components, molecular functions and biological processes into causally linked activity flow models. Pathway databases such as the Reactome Knowledgebase create detailed molecular process descriptions of reactions and assemble them, based on sharing of entities between individual reactions into pathway descriptions. RESULTS: To convert the rich content of Reactome into GO-CAMs, we have developed a software tool, Pathways2GO, to convert the entire set of normal human Reactome pathways into GO-CAMs. This conversion yields standard GO annotations from Reactome content and supports enhanced quality control for both Reactome and GO, yielding a nearly seamless conversion between these two resources for the bioinformatics community. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Benjamin M. Good, Kimberly Van Auken, David P. Hill, Huaiyu Mi, Seth Carbon, James P. Balhoff, Laurent-Philippe Albou, Paul D. Thomas, Chris Mungall, Judith A. Blake, Peter D'Eustachio |
Bioinform. | 10 |
| 2018 | Gearing up to handle the mosaic nature of life in the quest for orthologsabstractThe Quest for Orthologs (QfO) is an open collaboration framework for experts in comparative phylogenomics and related research areas who have an interest in highly accurate orthology predictions and their applications. We here report highlights and discussion points from the QfO meeting 2015 held in Barcelona. Achievements in recent years have established a basis to support developments for improved orthology prediction and to explore new approaches. Central to the QfO effort is proper benchmarking of methods and services, as well as design of standardized datasets and standardized formats to allow sharing and comparison of results. Simultaneously, analysis pipelines have been improved, evaluated and adapted to handle large datasets. All this would not have occurred without the long-term collaboration of Consortium members. Meeting regularly to review and coordinate complementary activities from a broad spectrum of innovative researchers clearly benefits the community. Highlights of the meeting include addressing sources of and legitimacy of disagreements between orthology calls, the context dependency of orthology definitions, special challenges encountered when analyzing very anciently rooted orthologies, orthology in the light of whole-genome duplications, and the concept of orthologous versus paralogous relationships at different levels, including domain-level orthology. Furthermore, particular needs for different applications (e.g. plant genomics, ancient gene families and others) and the infrastructure for making orthology inferences available (e.g. interfaces with model organism databases) were discussed, with several ongoing efforts that are expected to be reported on during the upcoming 2017 QfO meeting. Sofia K. Forslund, Cécile Pereira, Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez, Alan W. Sousa da Silva, Adrian M. Altenhoff, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Matthieu Muffato, Mateus Patricio, Klaas Vandepoele, Ingo Ebersberger, Judith A. Blake, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis, Brigitte Boeckmann, Toni Gabaldón, Erik L. L. Sonnhammer, Christophe Dessimoz, Suzanna Lewis |
Bioinform. | 11 |
| 2015 | A domain ontology for the Non-Coding RNA fieldabstractIdentification of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) has been significantly enhanced due to the rapid advancement in sequencing technologies. On the other hand, semantic annotation of ncRNA data lag behind their identification, and there is a great need to effectively integrate discovery from relevant communities. To this end, the Non-Coding RNA Ontology (NCRO) is being developed to provide a precisely defined ncRNA controlled vocabulary, which can fill a specific and highly needed niche in unification of ncRNA biology. Jingshan Huang, Karen Eilbeck, Judith A. Blake, Dejing Dou, Darren A. Natale, Alan Ruttenberg, Barry Smith 0001, Michael T. Zimmermann, Guoqian Jiang, Bin Wu 0008, Yongqun He, Shaojie Zhang 0001, Xiaowei Wang 0006, Zixing Liu |
BIBM | 3 |
| 2015 | A semantic approach for knowledge capture of MIcroRNA-Target gene interactionsabstractResearch has indicated that microRNAs (miRNAs), a special class of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), can perform important roles in different biological and pathological processes. miRNAs' functions are realized by regulating their respective target genes (targets). It is thus critical to identify and analyze miRNA-target interactions for a better understanding and delineation of miRNAs' functions. However, conventional knowledge discovery and acquisition methods have many limitations. Fortunately, semantic technologies that are based on domain ontologies can render great assistance in this regard. In our previous investigations, we developed a miRNA domain-specific application ontology, Ontology for MIcroRNA Target (OMIT), to provide the community with common data elements and data exchange standards in the miRNA research. This paper describes (1) our continuing efforts in the OMIT ontology development and (2) the application of the OMIT to enable a semantic approach for knowledge capture of miRNA-target interactions. Jingshan Huang, Fernando Gutierrez, Dejing Dou, Judith A. Blake, Karen Eilbeck, Darren A. Natale, Barry Smith 0001, Xiaowei Wang 0006, Zixing Liu, Alan Ruttenberg |
BIBM | 4 |
| 2014 | Methodology for the inference of gene function from phenotype dataabstractBACKGROUND: Biomedical ontologies are increasingly instrumental in the advancement of biological research primarily through their use to efficiently consolidate large amounts of data into structured, accessible sets. However, ontology development and usage can be hampered by the segregation of knowledge by domain that occurs due to independent development and use of the ontologies. The ability to infer data associated with one ontology to data associated with another ontology would prove useful in expanding information content and scope. We here focus on relating two ontologies: the Gene Ontology (GO), which encodes canonical gene function, and the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MP), which describes non-canonical phenotypes, using statistical methods to suggest GO functional annotations from existing MP phenotype annotations. This work is in contrast to previous studies that have focused on inferring gene function from phenotype primarily through lexical or semantic similarity measures. RESULTS: We have designed and tested a set of algorithms that represents a novel methodology to define rules for predicting gene function by examining the emergent structure and relationships between the gene functions and phenotypes rather than inspecting the terms semantically. The algorithms inspect relationships among multiple phenotype terms to deduce if there are cases where they all arise from a single gene function. We apply this methodology to data about genes in the laboratory mouse that are formally represented in the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) resource. From the data, 7444 rule instances were generated from five generalized rules, resulting in 4818 unique GO functional predictions for 1796 genes. CONCLUSIONS: We show that our method is capable of inferring high-quality functional annotations from curated phenotype data. As well as creating inferred annotations, our method has the potential to allow for the elucidation of unforeseen, biologically significant associations between gene function and phenotypes that would be overlooked by a semantics-based approach. Future work will include the implementation of the described algorithms for a variety of other model organism databases, taking full advantage of the abundance of available high quality curated data. Joao A. Ascensao, Mary E. Dolan, David P. Hill, Judith A. Blake |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2014 | A method for increasing expressivity of Gene Ontology annotations using a compositional approachabstractBACKGROUND: The Gene Ontology project integrates data about the function of gene products across a diverse range of organisms, allowing the transfer of knowledge from model organisms to humans, and enabling computational analyses for interpretation of high-throughput experimental and clinical data. The core data structure is the annotation, an association between a gene product and a term from one of the three ontologies comprising the GO. Historically, it has not been possible to provide additional information about the context of a GO term, such as the target gene or the location of a molecular function. This has limited the specificity of knowledge that can be expressed by GO annotations. RESULTS: The GO Consortium has introduced annotation extensions that enable manually curated GO annotations to capture additional contextual details. Extensions represent effector-target relationships such as localization dependencies, substrates of protein modifiers and regulation targets of signaling pathways and transcription factors as well as spatial and temporal aspects of processes such as cell or tissue type or developmental stage. We describe the content and structure of annotation extensions, provide examples, and summarize the current usage of annotation extensions. CONCLUSIONS: The additional contextual information captured by annotation extensions improves the utility of functional annotation by representing dependencies between annotations to terms in the different ontologies of GO, external ontologies, or an organism's gene products. These enhanced annotations can also support sophisticated queries and reasoning, and will provide curated, directional links between many gene products to support pathway and network reconstruction. Rachael P. Huntley, Midori A. Harris, Yasmin Alam-Faruque, Judith A. Blake, Seth Carbon, Heiko Dietze, Emily Dimmer, Rebecca E. Foulger, David P. Hill, Varsha K. Khodiyar, Antonia Lock, Jane Lomax, Ruth C. Lovering, Prudence Mutowo-Meullenet, Tony Sawford, Kimberly Van Auken, Valerie Wood, Chris Mungall |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2014 | DFLAT: functional annotation for human developmentabstractBACKGROUND: Recent increases in genomic studies of the developing human fetus and neonate have led to a need for widespread characterization of the functional roles of genes at different developmental stages. The Gene Ontology (GO), a valuable and widely-used resource for characterizing gene function, offers perhaps the most suitable functional annotation system for this purpose. However, due in part to the difficulty of studying molecular genetic effects in humans, even the current collection of comprehensive GO annotations for human genes and gene products often lacks adequate developmental context for scientists wishing to study gene function in the human fetus. DESCRIPTION: The Developmental FunctionaL Annotation at Tufts (DFLAT) project aims to improve the quality of analyses of fetal gene expression and regulation by curating human fetal gene functions using both manual and semi-automated GO procedures. Eligible annotations are then contributed to the GO database and included in GO releases of human data. DFLAT has produced a considerable body of functional annotation that we demonstrate provides valuable information about developmental genomics. A collection of gene sets (genes implicated in the same function or biological process), made by combining existing GO annotations with the 13,344 new DFLAT annotations, is available for use in novel analyses. Gene set analyses of expression in several data sets, including amniotic fluid RNA from fetuses with trisomies 21 and 18, umbilical cord blood, and blood from newborns with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, were conducted both with and without the DFLAT annotation. CONCLUSIONS: Functional analysis of expression data using the DFLAT annotation increases the number of implicated gene sets, reflecting the DFLAT's improved representation of current knowledge. Blinded literature review supports the validity of newly significant findings obtained with the DFLAT annotations. Newly implicated significant gene sets also suggest specific hypotheses for future research. Overall, the DFLAT project contributes new functional annotation and gene sets likely to enhance our ability to interpret genomic studies of human fetal and neonatal development. Heather C. Wick, Harold J. Drabkin, Huy Ngu, Michael Sackman, Craig Fournier, Jessica Haggett, Judith A. Blake, Diana W. Bianchi, Donna K. Slonim |
BMC Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2013 | Ontology based molecular signatures for immune cell types via gene expression analysisabstractBACKGROUND: New technologies are focusing on characterizing cell types to better understand their heterogeneity. With large volumes of cellular data being generated, innovative methods are needed to structure the resulting data analyses. Here, we describe an 'Ontologically BAsed Molecular Signature' (OBAMS) method that identifies novel cellular biomarkers and infers biological functions as characteristics of particular cell types. This method finds molecular signatures for immune cell types based on mapping biological samples to the Cell Ontology (CL) and navigating the space of all possible pairwise comparisons between cell types to find genes whose expression is core to a particular cell type's identity. RESULTS: We illustrate this ontological approach by evaluating expression data available from the Immunological Genome project (IGP) to identify unique biomarkers of mature B cell subtypes. We find that using OBAMS, candidate biomarkers can be identified at every strata of cellular identity from broad classifications to very granular. Furthermore, we show that Gene Ontology can be used to cluster cell types by shared biological processes in order to find candidate genes responsible for somatic hypermutation in germinal center B cells. Moreover, through in silico experiments based on this approach, we have identified genes sets that represent genes overexpressed in germinal center B cells and identify genes uniquely expressed in these B cells compared to other B cell types. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the utility of incorporating structured ontological knowledge into biological data analysis - providing a new method for defining novel biomarkers and providing an opportunity for new biological insights. Terrence F. Meehan, Nicole A. Vasilevsky, Chris Mungall, David S. Dougall, Melissa A. Haendel, Judith A. Blake, Alexander D. Diehl |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2013 | Ten Quick Tips for Using the Gene OntologyabstractThe Gene Ontology (GO) provides core biological knowledge representation for modern biologists, whether computationally or experimentally based. GO resources include biomedical ontologies that cover molecular domains of all life forms as well as extensive compilations of gene product annotations to these ontologies that provide largely species-neutral, comprehensive statements about what gene products do. Although extensively used in data analysis workflows, and widely incorporated into numerous data analysis platforms and applications, the general user of GO resources often misses fundamental distinctions about GO structures, GO annotations, and what can and can not be extrapolated from GO resources. Here are ten quick tips for using the Gene Ontology. Judith A. Blake |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2012 | Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpusabstractBACKGROUND: Manually annotated corpora are critical for the training and evaluation of automated methods to identify concepts in biomedical text. RESULTS: This paper presents the concept annotations of the Colorado Richly Annotated Full-Text (CRAFT) Corpus, a collection of 97 full-length, open-access biomedical journal articles that have been annotated both semantically and syntactically to serve as a research resource for the biomedical natural-language-processing (NLP) community. CRAFT identifies all mentions of nearly all concepts from nine prominent biomedical ontologies and terminologies: the Cell Type Ontology, the Chemical Entities of Biological Interest ontology, the NCBI Taxonomy, the Protein Ontology, the Sequence Ontology, the entries of the Entrez Gene database, and the three subontologies of the Gene Ontology. The first public release includes the annotations for 67 of the 97 articles, reserving two sets of 15 articles for future text-mining competitions (after which these too will be released). Concept annotations were created based on a single set of guidelines, which has enabled us to achieve consistently high interannotator agreement. CONCLUSIONS: As the initial 67-article release contains more than 560,000 tokens (and the full set more than 790,000 tokens), our corpus is among the largest gold-standard annotated biomedical corpora. Unlike most others, the journal articles that comprise the corpus are drawn from diverse biomedical disciplines and are marked up in their entirety. Additionally, with a concept-annotation count of nearly 100,000 in the 67-article subset (and more than 140,000 in the full collection), the scale of conceptual markup is also among the largest of comparable corpora. The concept annotations of the CRAFT Corpus have the potential to significantly advance biomedical text mining by providing a high-quality gold standard for NLP systems. The corpus, annotation guidelines, and other associated resources are freely available at http://bionlp-corpora.sourceforge.net/CRAFT/index.shtml. Michael Bada, Miriam Eckert, Donald Evans, Kristin Garcia, Krista Shipley, Dmitry Sitnikov, William A. Baumgartner Jr., Kevin Cohen 0001, Karin Verspoor, Judith A. Blake, Lawrence Hunter |
BMC Bioinform. | 10 |
| 2012 | On the Use of Gene Ontology Annotations to Assess Functional Similarity among Orthologs and Paralogs: A Short ReportabstractA recent paper (Nehrt et al., PLoS Comput. Biol. 7:e1002073, 2011) has proposed a metric for the "functional similarity" between two genes that uses only the Gene Ontology (GO) annotations directly derived from published experimental results. Applying this metric, the authors concluded that paralogous genes within the mouse genome or the human genome are more functionally similar on average than orthologous genes between these genomes, an unexpected result with broad implications if true. We suggest, based on both theoretical and empirical considerations, that this proposed metric should not be interpreted as a functional similarity, and therefore cannot be used to support any conclusions about the "ortholog conjecture" (or, more properly, the "ortholog functional conservation hypothesis"). First, we reexamine the case studies presented by Nehrt et al. as examples of orthologs with divergent functions, and come to a very different conclusion: they actually exemplify how GO annotations for orthologous genes provide complementary information about conserved biological functions. We then show that there is a global ascertainment bias in the experiment-based GO annotations for human and mouse genes: particular types of experiments tend to be performed in different model organisms. We conclude that the reported statistical differences in annotations between pairs of orthologous genes do not reflect differences in biological function, but rather complementarity in experimental approaches. Our results underscore two general considerations for researchers proposing novel types of analysis based on the GO: 1) that GO annotations are often incomplete, potentially in a biased manner, and subject to an "open world assumption" (absence of an annotation does not imply absence of a function), and 2) that conclusions drawn from a novel, large-scale GO analysis should whenever possible be supported by careful, in-depth examination of examples, to help ensure the conclusions have a justifiable biological basis. Paul D. Thomas, Valerie Wood, Chris Mungall, Suzanna Lewis, Judith A. Blake |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 5 |
| 2011 | The Representation of Protein Complexes in the Protein Ontology (PRO)abstractBACKGROUND: Representing species-specific proteins and protein complexes in ontologies that are both human- and machine-readable facilitates the retrieval, analysis, and interpretation of genome-scale data sets. Although existing protin-centric informatics resources provide the biomedical research community with well-curated compendia of protein sequence and structure, these resources lack formal ontological representations of the relationships among the proteins themselves. The Protein Ontology (PRO) Consortium is filling this informatics resource gap by developing ontological representations and relationships among proteins and their variants and modified forms. Because proteins are often functional only as members of stable protein complexes, the PRO Consortium, in collaboration with existing protein and pathway databases, has launched a new initiative to implement logical and consistent representation of protein complexes. DESCRIPTION: We describe here how the PRO Consortium is meeting the challenge of representing species-specific protein complexes, how protein complex representation in PRO supports annotation of protein complexes and comparative biology, and how PRO is being integrated into existing community bioinformatics resources. The PRO resource is accessible at http://pir.georgetown.edu/pro/. CONCLUSION: PRO is a unique database resource for species-specific protein complexes. PRO facilitates robust annotation of variations in composition and function contexts for protein complexes within and between species. Carol J. Bult, Harold J. Drabkin, Alexei V. Evsikov, Darren A. Natale, Cecilia N. Arighi, Natalia V. Roberts, Alan Ruttenberg, Peter D'Eustachio, Barry Smith 0001, Judith A. Blake, Cathy H. Wu |
BMC Bioinform. | 10 |
| 2011 | Logical Development of the Cell OntologyabstractBACKGROUND: The Cell Ontology (CL) is an ontology for the representation of in vivo cell types. As biological ontologies such as the CL grow in complexity, they become increasingly difficult to use and maintain. By making the information in the ontology computable, we can use automated reasoners to detect errors and assist with classification. Here we report on the generation of computable definitions for the hematopoietic cell types in the CL. RESULTS: Computable definitions for over 340 CL classes have been created using a genus-differentia approach. These define cell types according to multiple axes of classification such as the protein complexes found on the surface of a cell type, the biological processes participated in by a cell type, or the phenotypic characteristics associated with a cell type. We employed automated reasoners to verify the ontology and to reveal mistakes in manual curation. The implementation of this process exposed areas in the ontology where new cell type classes were needed to accommodate species-specific expression of cellular markers. Our use of reasoners also inferred new relationships within the CL, and between the CL and the contributing ontologies. This restructured ontology can be used to identify immune cells by flow cytometry, supports sophisticated biological queries involving cells, and helps generate new hypotheses about cell function based on similarities to other cell types. CONCLUSION: Use of computable definitions enhances the development of the CL and supports the interoperability of OBO ontologies. Terrence F. Meehan, Anna Maria Masci, Amina Abdulla, Lindsay G. Cowell, Judith A. Blake, Chris Mungall, Alexander D. Diehl |
BMC Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2011 | Hematopoietic cell types: Prototype for a revised cell ontology
Alexander D. Diehl, Alison Deckhut Augustine, Judith A. Blake, Lindsay G. Cowell, Elizabeth S. Gold, Timothy A. Gondré-Lewis, Anna Maria Masci, Terrence F. Meehan, Penelope A. Morel, Anastasia Nijnik, Björn Peters, Bali Pulendran, Richard H. Scheuermann, Q. Alison Yao, Martin S. Zand, Chris Mungall |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 3 |
| 2011 | Autism candidate genes via mouse phenomicsabstractAutism spectrum disorders (ASD) represent a group of developmental disabilities with a strong genetic basis. The laboratory mouse is increasingly used as a model organism for ASD, and MGI, the Mouse Genome Informatics resource, is the primary model organism database for the laboratory mouse. MGI uses the Mammalian Phenotype (MP) ontology to describe mouse models of human diseases. Using bioinformatics tools including Phenologs, MouseNET, and the Ontological Discovery Environment, we tested data associated with MP terms to characterize new gene-phenotype associations related to ASD. Our integrative analysis using these tools identified numerous mouse genotypes that are likely to have previously uncharacterized autistic-like phenotypes. The genes implicated in these mouse models had considerable overlap with a set of over 300 genes recently associated with ASD due to small, rare copy number variation (Pinto et al., 2010). Prediction and characterization of autistic mutant mouse alleles assists researchers in studying the complex nature of ASD and provides a generalizable approach to candidate gene prioritization. Terrence F. Meehan, Christopher J. Carr, Jeremy J. Jay, Carol J. Bult, Elissa J. Chesler, Judith A. Blake |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 6 |
| 2009 | TGF-beta signaling proteins and the Protein OntologyabstractBACKGROUND: The Protein Ontology (PRO) is designed as a formal and principled Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry ontology for proteins. The components of PRO extend from a classification of proteins on the basis of evolutionary relationships at the homeomorphic level to the representation of the multiple protein forms of a gene, including those resulting from alternative splicing, cleavage and/or post-translational modifications. Focusing specifically on the TGF-beta signaling proteins, we describe the building, curation, usage and dissemination of PRO. RESULTS: PRO is manually curated on the basis of PrePRO, an automatically generated file with content derived from standard protein data sources. Manual curation ensures that the treatment of the protein classes and the internal and external relationships conform to the PRO framework. The current release of PRO is based upon experimental data from mouse and human proteins wherein equivalent protein forms are represented by single terms. In addition to the PRO ontology, the annotation of PRO terms is released as a separate PRO association file, which contains, for each given PRO term, an annotation from the experimentally characterized sub-types as well as the corresponding database identifiers and sequence coordinates. The annotations are added in the form of relationship to other ontologies. Whenever possible, equivalent forms in other species are listed to facilitate cross-species comparison. Splice and allelic variants, gene fusion products and modified protein forms are all represented as entities in the ontology. Therefore, PRO provides for the representation of protein entities and a resource for describing the associated data. This makes PRO useful both for proteomics studies where isoforms and modified forms must be differentiated, and for studies of biological pathways, where representations need to take account of the different ways in which the cascade of events may depend on specific protein modifications. CONCLUSION: PRO provides a framework for the formal representation of protein classes and protein forms in the OBO Foundry. It is designed to enable data retrieval and integration and machine reasoning at the molecular level of proteins, thereby facilitating cross-species comparisons, pathway analysis, disease modeling and the generation of new hypotheses. Cecilia N. Arighi, Darren A. Natale, Winona C. Barker, Harold J. Drabkin, Judith A. Blake, Barry Smith 0001, Cathy H. Wu |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2009 | PhenoGO: an integrated resource for the multiscale mining of clinical and biological dataabstractThe evolving complexity of genome-scale experiments has increasingly centralized the role of a highly computable, accurate, and comprehensive resource spanning multiple biological scales and viewpoints. To provide a resource to meet this need, we have significantly extended the PhenoGO database with gene-disease specific annotations and included an additional ten species. This a computationally-derived resource is primarily intended to provide phenotypic context (cell type, tissue, organ, and disease) for mining existing associations between gene products and GO terms specified in the Gene Ontology Databases Automated natural language processing (BioMedLEE) and computational ontology (PhenOS) methods were used to derive these relationships from the literature, expanding the database with information from ten additional species to include over 600,000 phenotypic contexts spanning eleven species from five GO annotation databases. A comprehensive evaluation evaluating the mappings (n = 300) found precision (positive predictive value) at 85%, and recall (sensitivity) at 76%. Phenotypes are encoded in general purpose ontologies such as Cell Ontology, the Unified Medical Language System, and in specialized ontologies such as the Mouse Anatomy and the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology. A web portal has also been developed, allowing for advanced filtering and querying of the database as well as download of the entire dataset http://www.phenogo.org. Lee T. Sam, Eneida A. Mendonça, Jianrong Li, Judith A. Blake, Carol Friedman, Yves A. Lussier |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2008 | Using bio-ontologies as data annotation, integration & analytical tools at the Mouse Genome Informatics resourceabstractThe mouse genome informatics (MGI) resource, an in-depth resource for the genetics, genomics and biology of the laboratory mouse, provides free access to integrated data on diverse biological attributes, ranging from sequence to phenotype and disease model representation. MGI advances translational research through an integrated data platform that facilitates acquisition, explicit representation, and semantic querying and interpretation of multi-parametric genome-scale datasets, and fosters interoperability across different model organism systems and disparate data sources. To this end, MGI employs a set of logically rigorous, dynamic, and cross-referenceable ontologies to unambiguously describe current biological knowledge, expedite manual curation, and advance the informatics capacity to execute complex data mining tasks relevant to comparative and functional genomics. Major bio-ontologies developed and implemented at MGI include the gene ontology (GO), Mammalian Phenotype (MP) ontology, and adult mouse anatomical (MA) Dictionary, reviewed in this paper. All these share a common generic vocabulary infrastructure, and utilize identical annotation tools and web-based browsers to reinforce ontology-centric curation and support ontology-driven querying of the vocabularies and the associated knowledgebase. Anna V. Anagnostopoulos, Judith A. Blake, Carol J. Bult, Martin Ringwald, Joel E. Richardson, James A. Kadin, Janan T. Eppig |
BIBE | 2 |
| 2008 | Gene Ontology annotations: what they mean and where they come fromabstractTo address the challenges of information integration and retrieval, the computational genomics community increasingly has come to rely on the methodology of creating annotations of scientific literature using terms from controlled structured vocabularies such as the Gene Ontology (GO). Here we address the question of what such annotations signify and of how they are created by working biologists. Our goal is to promote a better understanding of how the results of experiments are captured in annotations, in the hope that this will lead both to better representations of biological reality through annotation and ontology development and to more informed use of GO resources by experimental scientists. David P. Hill, Barry Smith 0001, Monica S. McAndrews-Hill, Judith A. Blake |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2007 | Ontology development for biological systems: immunologyabstractUNLABELLED: We recently implemented improvements to the representation of immunology content of the biological process branch of the Gene Ontology (GO). The aims of the revision were to provide a comprehensive representation of immunological processes and to improve the organization of immunology related terms in the GO to match current concepts in the field of immunology. With these improvements, the GO will better reflect current understanding in the field of immunology and thus prove to be a more valuable resource for knowledge representation in gene annotation and analysis in the areas of immunology related to genomics and bioinformatics. AVAILABILITY: http://www.geneontology.org. Alexander D. Diehl, Jamie A. Lee, Richard H. Scheuermann, Judith A. Blake |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2007 | Framework for a Protein OntologyabstractBiomedical ontologies are emerging as critical tools in genomic and proteomic research, where complex data in disparate resources need to be integrated. A number of ontologies describe properties that can be attributed to proteins. For example, protein functions are described by the Gene Ontology (GO) and human diseases by SNOMED CT or ICD10. There is, however, a gap in the current set of ontologies - one that describes the protein entities themselves and their relationships. We have designed the PRotein Ontology (PRO) to facilitate protein annotation and to guide new experiments. The components of PRO extend from the classification of proteins on the basis of evolutionary relationships to the representation of the multiple protein forms of a gene (products generated by genetic variation, alternative splicing, proteolytic cleavage, and other post-translational modifications). PRO will allow the specification of relationships between PRO, GO and other ontologies in the OBO Foundry. Here we describe the initial development of PRO, illustrated using human and mouse proteins involved in the transforming growth factor-beta and bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways. Darren A. Natale, Cecilia N. Arighi, Winona C. Barker, Judith A. Blake, Ti-Cheng Chang, Zhang-Zhi Hu, Barry Smith 0001, Cathy H. Wu |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2006 | A Natural Language Processing (NLP) Tool to Assist in the Curation Of the Laboratory Mouse Tumor Biology Database
Hua Xu 0001, Debra M. Krupke, Judith A. Blake, Carol Friedman |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2006 | Using Ontology Visualization to Coordinate Cross-species Functional Annotation for Human Disease GenesabstractBiomedical ontologies provide a representational system to support the integration and retrieval of biological knowledge. The Gene Ontology (GO) is widely used to annotate molecular attributes of genes and provides a common paradigm for comparative functional analysis research. One way to expand the view of the function of any one gene product is to compare annotations of genes that share close evolutionary relationships and are likely to function in similar ways, such as orthologous genes. We are exploring the power of the GO and orthology sets to provide a comprehensive view of annotations coordinated across species by presenting annotations visualized within the ontology relationship structure. This work describes the application of our ontology visualization approach to a set of model organism genes that are orthologous to human disease genes. Mary E. Dolan, Judith A. Blake |
CBMS | 2 |
| 2006 | Beyond the data deluge: Data integration and bio-ontologies
Judith A. Blake, Carol J. Bult |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 1 |
| 2005 | Ontological visualization of protein-protein interactionsabstractBACKGROUND: Cellular processes require the interaction of many proteins across several cellular compartments. Determining the collective network of such interactions is an important aspect of understanding the role and regulation of individual proteins. The Gene Ontology (GO) is used by model organism databases and other bioinformatics resources to provide functional annotation of proteins. The annotation process provides a mechanism to document the binding of one protein with another. We have constructed protein interaction networks for mouse proteins utilizing the information encoded in the GO annotations. The work reported here presents a methodology for integrating and visualizing information on protein-protein interactions. RESULTS: GO annotation at Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) captures 1318 curated, documented interactions. These include 129 binary interactions and 125 interaction involving three or more gene products. Three networks involve over 30 partners, the largest involving 109 proteins. Several tools are available at MGI to visualize and analyze these data. CONCLUSIONS: Curators at the MGI database annotate protein-protein interaction data from experimental reports from the literature. Integration of these data with the other types of data curated at MGI places protein binding data into the larger context of mouse biology and facilitates the generation of new biological hypotheses based on physical interactions among gene products. Harold J. Drabkin, Christopher Hollenbeck, David P. Hill, Judith A. Blake |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2004 | From Sipping on a Straw to Drinking from a Fire Hose: Data Integration in a Public Genome DatabaseabstractBiology is a vast domain. The Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) system, which focuses on the biology of the laboratory mouse, covers only a small, carefully chosen slice. Nevertheless, we deal with data of immense variety, deep complexity, and exponentially growing volume. Our role as an integration nexus is to add value by combining data sets of diverse types and origins, eliminating redundancy and resolving conflicts. We briefly describe some of the issues we face and approaches we have adopted to the integration problem. Joel E. Richardson, James A. Kadin, Judith A. Blake, Carol J. Bult, Janan T. Eppig, Martin Ringwald |
ICDE | 3 |
| 2004 | A short study on the success of the Gene Ontology
Michael Bada, Robert Stevens 0001, Carole A. Goble, Yolanda Gil, Michael Ashburner, Judith A. Blake, J. Michael Cherry, Midori A. Harris, Suzanna Lewis |
J. Web Semant. | 6 |
| 2000 | Mouse Genome Informatics in a New Age of Biological InquiryabstractData integration is key to knowledge discovery in the age of genomics and represents a major, long-standing challenge for the genome informatics community. Integration of data across heterogeneous genome databases requires the identification of common data entities and mechanisms to ensure referential integrity and persistence of these common entities even as our understanding of their biological properties changes. The Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) database group employs multiple strategies for achieving data integration and maintaining inter-connectedness with other databases, including: (1) the use of permanent, unique accession IDs for identifying core data entities, (2) the application of nomenclature standards for naming genes and strains of mice, and (3) the development and implementation of controlled vocabularies and ontologies to ensure semantic consistency of biological concepts within and across model organism databases. Carol J. Bult, Joel E. Richardson, Judith A. Blake, James A. Kadin, Martin Ringwald, Janan T. Eppig |
BIBE | 3 |