Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arash Molavi Kakhki

dblp:35/7209 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-8066-3602ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
6 papers
Transport protocols and congestion control · 26% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 22% Network measurement and analytics · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 91% Recommender systems · 9%
Network and information security
2 papers
Network security · 57% Systems and software security · 33% Authentication and access control · 10%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › duplexing
time division duplex
0.422015
Identifying Traffic Differentiation in Mobile Networks · Internet Measurement Conference 2015
Identifying traffic differentiation on cellular data networks · SIGCOMM 2014
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › aeronautical communication
air-to-ground communication
0.312018
Mile High WiFi: A First Look At In-Flight Internet Connectivity · WWW 2018
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › aerial networks
in-flight internet
0.312018
Mile High WiFi: A First Look At In-Flight Internet Connectivity · WWW 2018
Transport protocols and congestion control › QUIC
QUIC performance
0.312018
Mile High WiFi: A First Look At In-Flight Internet Connectivity · WWW 2018
Network optimization and economics › network economics › internet economics
network neutrality
0.312017
lib•erate, (n): a library for exposing (traffic-classification) rules and avoiding them efficiently · Internet Measurement Conference 2017
Network security › traffic analysis
traffic classification
0.312017
lib•erate, (n): a library for exposing (traffic-classification) rules and avoiding them efficiently · Internet Measurement Conference 2017
Network measurement and analytics
traffic classification
0.212016
Classifiers Unclassified: An Efficient Approach to Revealing IP Traffic Classification Rules · Internet Measurement Conference 2016
Cellular and mobile networks › mobile networks
mobile data networks
0.212014
Identifying traffic differentiation on cellular data networks · SIGCOMM 2014
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.212013
Measuring personalization of web search · WWW 2013
Information retrieval › web search
search personalization
0.212013
Measuring personalization of web search · WWW 2013
Information retrieval
web search
0.212013
Measuring personalization of web search · WWW 2013
Systems and software security › distributed system security
sybil attack
0.212013
Iolaus: securing online content rating systems · WWW 2013
Transport protocols and congestion control
transport protocol design
0.112017
Taking a long look at QUIC: an approach for rigorous evaluation of rapidly evolving transport protocols · Internet Measurement Conference 2017
Transport protocols and congestion control › transport protocols
UDP-based transport
0.112017
Taking a long look at QUIC: an approach for rigorous evaluation of rapidly evolving transport protocols · Internet Measurement Conference 2017
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
ISP traffic management
0.112014
Identifying traffic differentiation on cellular data networks · SIGCOMM 2014
Recommender systems › fairness and bias
filter bubble
0.012013
Measuring personalization of web search · WWW 2013
Authentication and access control › trust management
reputation systems
0.012013
Iolaus: securing online content rating systems · WWW 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network measurement · 0.3network emulation · 0.3protocol analysis · 0.3evaluation methodology · 0.3measurement study · 0.2mobile replay · 0.2controlled experiments · 0.2user study · 0.2rating integrity · 0.2measurement · 0.2identity verification · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Mile High WiFi: A First Look At In-Flight Internet Connectivity
abstract
In-Flight Communication (IFC), available on a growing number of commercial flights, is often received by consumers with both awe for its mere availability and harsh criticism for its poor performance. Indeed, IFC provides Internet connectivity in some of the most challenging conditions with aircraft traveling at speeds in excess of 500 mph at 30,000 feet above the ground. Yet, while existing services do provide basic Internet \em accessibility, anecdotal reports rank their quality of service as, at best, poor. In this paper, we present the first characterization of deployed IFC systems. Using over 45 flight-hours of measurements, we profile the performance of IFC across the two dominant access technologies -- direct air-to-ground communication (DA2GC) and mobile satellite service (MSS). We show that IFC QoS is in large part determined by the high latencies inherent to DA2GC and MSS, with RTTs averaging 200ms and 750ms, respectively, and that these high latencies directly impact the performance of common applications such as web browsing. While each IFC technology is based on well studied wireless communication technologies, our findings reveal that IFC links experience further degraded link performance than their technological antecedents. We find median loss rates of 7%, and nearly 40% loss at the 90th percentile for MSS, 6.8x larger than recent characterizations of residential satellite networks. We extend our IFC study exploring the potential of the newly released HTTP/2 and QUIC protocols in an emulated IFC environment, finding that QUIC is able to improve page load times by as much as 7.9 times. In addition, we find that HTTP/2»s use of multiplexing multiple requests onto a single TCP connection performs up to 4.8x \em worse than HTTP/1.1 when faced with large numbers of objects. We use network emulation to explore proposed technological improvements to existing IFC systems finding that high link losses, and not bandwidth, account for the largest factor of performance degradation with applications such as web browsing.
John P. Rula, James Newman, Fabián E. Bustamante, Arash Molavi Kakhki, David R. Choffnes
WWW4
2017 Taking a long look at QUIC: an approach for rigorous evaluation of rapidly evolving transport protocols
abstract
Google's QUIC protocol, which implements TCP-like properties at the application layer atop a UDP transport, is now used by the vast majority of Chrome clients accessing Google properties but has no formal state machine specification, limited analysis, and ad-hoc evaluations based on snapshots of the protocol implementation in a small number of environments. Further frustrating attempts to evaluate QUIC is the fact that the protocol is under rapid development, with extensive rewriting of the protocol occurring over the scale of months, making individual studies of the protocol obsolete before publication.
Arash Molavi Kakhki, Samuel Jero, David R. Choffnes, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alan Mislove
Internet Measurement Conference1
2017 lib•erate, (n): a library for exposing (traffic-classification) rules and avoiding them efficiently
abstract
Middleboxes implement a variety of network management policies (e.g., prioritizing or blocking traffic) in their networks. While such policies can be beneficial (e.g., blocking malware) they also raise issues of network neutrality and freedom of speech when used for application-specific differentiation and censorship. There is a poor understanding of how such policies are implemented in practice, and how they can be evaded efficiently. As a result, most circumvention solutions are brittle, point solutions based on manual analysis.
Fangfan Li, Abbas Razaghpanah, Arash Molavi Kakhki, Arian Akhavan Niaki, David R. Choffnes, Phillipa Gill, Alan Mislove
Internet Measurement Conference3
2016 Classifiers Unclassified: An Efficient Approach to Revealing IP Traffic Classification Rules
Fangfan Li, Arash Molavi Kakhki, David R. Choffnes, Phillipa Gill, Alan Mislove
Internet Measurement Conference2
2015 Identifying Traffic Differentiation in Mobile Networks
abstract
Traffic differentiation---giving better (or worse) performance to certain classes of Internet traffic---is a well-known but poorly understood traffic management policy. There is active discussion on whether and how ISPs should be allowed to differentiate Internet traffic, but little data about current practices to inform this discussion. Previous work attempted to address this problem for fixed line networks; however, there is currently no solution that works in the more challenging mobile environment.
Arash Molavi Kakhki, Abbas Razaghpanah, Anke Li, Hyungjoon Koo, Rajesh Golani, David R. Choffnes, Phillipa Gill, Alan Mislove
Internet Measurement Conference1
2014 Identifying traffic differentiation on cellular data networks
abstract
The goal of this research is to detect traffic differentiation in cellular data networks. We define service differentiation as any attempt to change the performance of network traffic traversing an ISP's boundaries. ISPs may implement differentiation policies for a number of reasons, including load balancing, bandwidth management, or business reasons. Specifically, we focus on detecting whether certain types of network traffic receive better (or worse) performance. As an example, a wireless provider might limit the performance of third-party VoIP or video calling services (or any other competing services) by introducing delays or reducing transfer rates to encourage users to use services provided by the wireless provider. Previous work explored this problem in limited environments. Glasnost focused on BitTorrent in the desktop/laptop environment, and lacked the ability to conduct controlled experiments to provide strong evidence of differentiation. NetDiff covered a wide range of passively gathered traffic from a large ISP but likewise did not support targeted, controlled experiments. We address these limitations with Mobile Replay.
Arash Molavi Kakhki, Abbas Razaghpanah, Rajesh Golani, David R. Choffnes, Phillipa Gill, Alan Mislove
SIGCOMM1
2013 Measuring personalization of web search
abstract
Web search is an integral part of our daily lives. Recently, there has been a trend of personalization in Web search, where different users receive different results for the same search query. The increasing personalization is leading to concerns about Filter Bubble effects, where certain users are simply unable to access information that the search engines' algorithm decides is irrelevant. Despite these concerns, there has been little quantification of the extent of personalization in Web search today, or the user attributes that cause it.
Aniko Hannak, Piotr Sapiezynski, Arash Molavi Kakhki, Balachander Krishnamurthy, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, Christo Wilson
WWW3
2013 Iolaus: securing online content rating systems
abstract
Online content ratings services allow users to find and share content ranging from news articles (Digg) to videos (YouTube) to businesses (Yelp). Generally, these sites allow users to create accounts, declare friendships, upload and rate content, and locate new content by leveraging the aggregated ratings of others. These services are becoming increasingly popular; Yelp alone has over 33 million reviews. Unfortunately, this popularity is leading to increasing levels of malicious activity, including multiple identity (Sybil) attacks and the "buying" of ratings from users.
Arash Molavi Kakhki, Chloe Kliman-Silver, Alan Mislove
WWW1
2009 A comparison of linear and non-linear transmitter and receiver antenna array processing for interference nulling and diversity with non-zero CSI feedback delay
abstract
The performance of receiver, transmitter, and joint transmitter/receiver antenna array processing for interference nulling and diversity over fading radio links are compared and contrasted in this paper. Specific examples of linear and non-linear algorithms are considered in this context. To perform transmitter processing, a priori knowledge of the radio propagation channel is required at the transmitter. This is typically achieved by the provision of a feedback loop that supplies the transmitter with the channel state information (CSI). The impact on transmitter processing of non-zero delays in the CSI feedback loop is quantified in this paper. It is assumed that channel estimation is performed with perfect accuracy at the receiver, and that the feedback loop is error-free. It is shown that while transmitter processing out performs receiver processing at low relative Doppler frequencies, its performance degrades rapidly when the CSI feedback delay is greater than 2% of the channel coherence time. The results presented can be readily interpreted in the context of multi-user uplink and downlink in cellular systems, or collaborative signal processing among base stations.
Arash Molavi Kakhki, Hamid Reza Karimi
IWCMC1