Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Brian E. Aydemir

dblp:35/758 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 67% Program verification · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics
0.112008
Engineering formal metatheory · POPL 2008
Program verification › formal proof
mechanized proof
0.112008
Engineering formal metatheory · POPL 2008
Programming languages and type systems › lambda calculus
variable binding
0.112008
Engineering formal metatheory · POPL 2008
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Engineering formal metatheory
abstract
Machine-checked proofs of properties of programming languages have become acritical need, both for increased confidence in large and complex designsand as a foundation for technologies such as proof-carrying code. However, constructing these proofs remains a black art, involving many choices in the formulation of definitions and theorems that make a huge cumulative difference in the difficulty of carrying out large formal developments. There presentation and manipulation of terms with variable binding is a key issue.
Brian E. Aydemir, Arthur Charguéraud, Benjamin C. Pierce, Randy Pollack, Stephanie Weirich
POPL1