EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian E. Aydemir
dblp:35/758
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 67% Program verification · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Engineering formal metatheory · POPL 2008 |
Program verification › formal proof
mechanized proof |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Engineering formal metatheory · POPL 2008 |
Programming languages and type systems › lambda calculus
variable binding |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Engineering formal metatheory · POPL 2008 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Engineering formal metatheoryabstractMachine-checked proofs of properties of programming languages have become acritical need, both for increased confidence in large and complex designsand as a foundation for technologies such as proof-carrying code. However, constructing these proofs remains a black art, involving many choices in the formulation of definitions and theorems that make a huge cumulative difference in the difficulty of carrying out large formal developments. There presentation and manipulation of terms with variable binding is a key issue. Brian E. Aydemir, Arthur Charguéraud, Benjamin C. Pierce, Randy Pollack, Stephanie Weirich |
POPL | 1 |