Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Holec

dblp:35/9967 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.112011
A probabilistic quality metric for camera placement in 3D reconstructions · ICRA 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
reconstruction quality assessment
0.112011
A probabilistic quality metric for camera placement in 3D reconstructions · ICRA 2011
Computational photography and imaging
camera localization
0.112011
A probabilistic quality metric for camera placement in 3D reconstructions · ICRA 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A probabilistic quality metric for camera placement in 3D reconstructions
abstract
This paper describes the use of a probabilistic quality metric for planning camera placement for 3D reconstructions. A probabilistic quality metric estimates the probability of a reconstruction achieving a desired goal. This probabilistic model leads to the natural integration of many different factors influencing the quality of a reconstruction without relying on arbitrary weights for those factors. The specific factors addressed here are occlusions, feature matching, and feature localization. It is demonstrated how these factors impact the quality of a reconstruction and how they can be accounted for in a probabilistic manner. The developed quality metric is then used to optimize a camera network for patient tracking during tomotherapy.
Eric Holec, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos
ICRA1