Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zeman Li
dblp:350/3818
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Learning theory · 19% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PiKE: Adaptive Data Mixing for Large-Scale Multi-Task Learning Under Low Gradient Conflicts · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
gradient matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Synthetic Text Generation for Training Large Language Models via Gradient Matching · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
large-scale pretraining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PiKE: Adaptive Data Mixing for Large-Scale Multi-Task Learning Under Low Gradient Conflicts · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
memory-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
synthetic text generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Synthetic Text Generation for Training Large Language Models via Gradient Matching · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Synthetic Text Generation for Training Large Language Models via Gradient Matching · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Synthetic Text Generation for Training Large Language Models via Gradient Matching · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
gradient conflict |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PiKE: Adaptive Data Mixing for Large-Scale Multi-Task Learning Under Low Gradient Conflicts · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
stochastic convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient matching · 1.7alternating direction method of multipliers · 1.7mean estimation · 1.5empirical risk minimization · 1.5zeroth-order optimization · 0.9stochastic gradient descent · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.9gradient conflict mitigation · 0.9convergence analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Addax: Utilizing Zeroth-Order Gradients to Improve Memory Efficiency and Performance of SGD for Fine-Tuning Language ModelsabstractFine-tuning language models (LMs) with the standard Adam optimizer often demands excessive memory, limiting accessibility. The ``in-place'' version of Stochastic Gradient Descent (IP-SGD) and Memory-Efficient Zeroth-order Optimizer (MeZO) have been proposed as solutions to improve memory efficiency. However, IP-SGD still requires a decent amount of memory, and MeZO suffers from slow convergence and degraded final performance due to its zeroth-order nature. This paper introduces Addax, a novel method that improves both memory efficiency and algorithm performance of IP-SGD by integrating it with MeZO. Specifically, Addax computes the zeroth-order or first-order gradient of the data points in the minibatch based on their memory consumption and combines zeroth- and first-order gradient estimates to obtain the updated direction in each step.
By computing the zeroth-order order gradient of data points that require more memory and the first-order gradient of the ones that require less memory, Addax overcomes the slow convergence of MeZO and excessive memory requirement of IP-SGD. Additionally, the zeroth-order gradient acts as a regularizer for the first-order gradient, further enhancing the model's final performance.
Theoretically, we establish the convergence of Addax under mild assumptions, demonstrating faster convergence and less restrictive hyper-parameter choices than MeZO. Our extensive experiments with diverse LMs and tasks show that Addax consistently outperforms MeZO in terms of accuracy and convergence speed, while having a comparable memory footprint.
In particular, our experiments using one A100 GPU on OPT-13B model reveal that, on average, Addax outperforms MeZO in terms of accuracy/F1 score by 14%, and runs $15\times$ faster, while having a comparable memory footprint to MeZO. In our experiments on the larger OPT-30B model, on average, Addax outperforms MeZO in terms of accuracy/F1 score by >16% and runs $30\times$ faster on a single H100 GPU. Moreover, Addax surpasses the performance of standard fine-tuning approaches, such as IP-SGD and Adam, in most tasks in terms of Accuracy/F1 score with significantly less memory requirement. Zeman Li, Xinwei Zhang 0001, Peilin Zhong, Meisam Razaviyayn, Vahab S. Mirrokni |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Synthetic Text Generation for Training Large Language Models via Gradient MatchingabstractSynthetic data has the potential to improve the performance, training efficiency, and privacy of real training examples. Nevertheless, existing approaches for synthetic text generation are mostly heuristics and cannot generate human-readable text without compromising the privacy of real data, or provide performance guarantees for training Large Language Models (LLMs). In this work, we propose the first theoretically rigorous approach for generating synthetic human-readable text that provides convergence, performance, and privacy guarantees for fine-tuning LLMs on a target task. To do so, we leverage Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) that iteratively optimizes the embeddings of synthetic examples to match the noisy gradient of the target training or validation data, and maps them to a sequence of text tokens with low perplexity. In doing so, the generated synthetic text guarantees convergence of the model to a close neighborhood of the solution obtained by fine-tuning on real data and preserves their privacy. Experiments on various classification tasks confirm the effectiveness of our proposed approach. Our code is available at [https://github.com/BigML-CS-UCLA/GRADMM](https://github.com/BigML-CS-UCLA/GRADMM). Zeman Li, Mohammad Hossein Bateni 0001, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Meisam Razaviyayn, Baharan Mirzasoleiman |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | PiKE: Adaptive Data Mixing for Large-Scale Multi-Task Learning Under Low Gradient ConflictsabstractModern foundation models are trained on diverse datasets to enhance generalization across tasks and domains. A central challenge in this process is determining how to effectively mix and sample data from multiple sources. This naturally leads to a multi-task learning (MTL) perspective. While prior work in MTL has emphasized mitigating gradient conflicts, we observe that large-scale pretraining scenarios—such as multilingual or multi-domain training—often exhibit little to no gradient conflict. Motivated by this observation, we propose $\textbf{PiKE}$ ($\textbf{P}$ositive gradient $\textbf{i}$nteraction-based $\textbf{K}$-task weights $\textbf{E}$stimator), an adaptive data mixing algorithm that dynamically adjusts sampling weights during training. PiKE exploits non-conflicting gradient interactions to minimize a near-tight upper bound on the average loss decrease at each step, while incurring negligible computational overhead. We provide theoretical convergence guarantees and show that PiKE outperforms static and non-adaptive mixing baselines. Furthermore, we extend PiKE to promote balanced learning across tasks. Extensive experiments on large-scale language model pretraining confirm that PiKE achieves faster convergence and improved downstream performance compared to existing approaches. Zeman Li, Peilin Zhong, Meisam Razaviyayn, Vahab S. Mirrokni |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public DataabstractDifferential privacy (DP) ensures that training a machine learning model does not leak private data. In practice, we may have access to auxiliary public data that is free of privacy concerns. In this work, we assume access to a given amount of public data and settle the following fundamental open questions: 1. What is the optimal (worst-case) error of a DP model trained over a private data set while having access to side public data? 2. How can we harness public data to improve DP model training in practice? We consider these questions in both the local and central models of pure and approximate DP. To answer the first question, we prove tight (up to log factors) lower and upper bounds that characterize the optimal error rates of three fundamental problems: mean estimation, empirical risk minimization, and stochastic convex optimization. We show that the optimal error rates can be attained (up to log factors) by either discarding private data and training a public model, or treating public data like it is private and using an optimal DP algorithm. To address the second question, we develop novel algorithms that are "even more optimal" (i.e. better constants) than the asymptotically optimal approaches described above. For local DP mean estimation, our algorithm is optimal including constants. Empirically, our algorithms show benefits over the state-of-the-art. Andrew Lowy, Zeman Li, Tianjian Huang, Meisam Razaviyayn |
ICML | 2 |