Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Bodard
dblp:350/9775
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
saddle point escape |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient clipping · 0.9dynamical systems theory · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioningabstractWe study generalized smoothness in nonconvex optimization, focusing on $(L_0, L_1)$-smoothness and anisotropic smoothness. The former was empirically derived from practical neural network training examples, while the latter arises naturally in the analysis of nonlinearly preconditioned gradient methods. We introduce a new sufficient condition that encompasses both notions, reveals their close connection, and holds in key applications such as phase retrieval and matrix factorization. Leveraging tools from dynamical systems theory, we then show that nonlinear preconditioning—including gradient clipping—preserves the saddle point avoidance property of classical gradient descent. Crucially, the assumptions required for this analysis are actually satisfied in these applications, unlike in classical results that rely on restrictive Lipschitz smoothness conditions. We further analyze a perturbed variant that efficiently attains second-order stationarity with only logarithmic dependence on dimension, matching similar guarantees of classical gradient methods. Alexander Bodard, Panagiotis Patrinos |
NeurIPS | 1 |