Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Bodard

dblp:350/9775 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent
0.912025
Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioning · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.912025
Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioning · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
saddle point escape
0.912025
Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioning · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient clipping · 0.9dynamical systems theory · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Escaping saddle points without Lipschitz smoothness: the power of nonlinear preconditioning
abstract
We study generalized smoothness in nonconvex optimization, focusing on $(L_0, L_1)$-smoothness and anisotropic smoothness. The former was empirically derived from practical neural network training examples, while the latter arises naturally in the analysis of nonlinearly preconditioned gradient methods. We introduce a new sufficient condition that encompasses both notions, reveals their close connection, and holds in key applications such as phase retrieval and matrix factorization. Leveraging tools from dynamical systems theory, we then show that nonlinear preconditioning—including gradient clipping—preserves the saddle point avoidance property of classical gradient descent. Crucially, the assumptions required for this analysis are actually satisfied in these applications, unlike in classical results that rely on restrictive Lipschitz smoothness conditions. We further analyze a perturbed variant that efficiently attains second-order stationarity with only logarithmic dependence on dimension, matching similar guarantees of classical gradient methods.
Alexander Bodard, Panagiotis Patrinos
NeurIPS1