Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Hayri Alper Arslan

dblp:351/0531 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2359-7773ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design
0.712023
On the Timing of Auctions: The Effects of Complementarities on Bidding, Participation, and Welfare · EC 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design
0.712023
On the Timing of Auctions: The Effects of Complementarities on Bidding, Participation, and Welfare · EC 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory › auction mechanism
procurement auction
0.712023
On the Timing of Auctions: The Effects of Complementarities on Bidding, Participation, and Welfare · EC 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design › dynamic auction
sequential auction
0.712023
On the Timing of Auctions: The Effects of Complementarities on Bidding, Participation, and Welfare · EC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

game theory · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 On the Timing of Auctions: The Effects of Complementarities on Bidding, Participation, and Welfare
abstract
Large corporations, local governments, and state agencies often seek suppliers for various different contracts through a sequence of auction rounds. In these extensive procurement markets, bidders frequently participate in multiple auctions held simultaneously or in different periods, submitting bids and winning contracts. Additionally, factors such as economies of scale, capacity limitations, and overlapping work periods can cause a bidder's cost of completing multiple projects to differ from the sum of their costs for each project individually. These non-additivities, which we refer to generically as complementarities, lead to changes in bidders' relative competitiveness over time, influenced by the characteristics of both current and previously won contracts. These dynamics can impact how and for which auctions bidders ultimately decide to bid. Consequently, by strategically timing auctions across periods, the procurer can exploit these strategic effects to enhance both their own expenses and overall efficiency in the procurement process. Currently, very little is known about this aspect of procurement design.
Alex P. Arsenault-Morin, Hayri Alper Arslan, Matthew Gentry
EC2