Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Geraci
dblp:351/0600
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 62% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% Multi-agent systems · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
abusive language detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships · ACL (1) 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › normative multi-agent systems › social norms
social norm modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social Relationships · ACL (1) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relationship modeling · 1.3large language model · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Your spouse needs professional help: Determining the Contextual Appropriateness of Messages through Modeling Social RelationshipsabstractUnderstanding interpersonal communication requires, in part, understanding the social context and norms in which a message is said.However, current methods for identifying offensive content in such communication largely operate independent of context, with only a few approaches considering community norms or prior conversation as context.Here, we introduce a new approach to identifying inappropriate communication by explicitly modeling the social relationship between the individuals.We introduce a new dataset of contextually-situated judgments of appropriateness and show that large language models can readily incorporate relationship information to accurately identify appropriateness in a given context.Using data from online conversations and movie dialogues, we provide insight into how the relationships themselves function as implicit norms and quantify the degree to which context-sensitivity is needed in different conversation settings.Further, we also demonstrate that contextualappropriateness judgments are predictive of other social factors expressed in language such as condescension and politeness. David Jurgens, Agrima Seth, Jackson Sargent, Athena Aghighi, Michael Geraci |
ACL (1) | 5 |