Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniele Lunghi
dblp:351/0848
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1324-981XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
evasion attack |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Computational finance and economics › fraud detection
credit card fraud detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Computational finance and economics
fraud detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Fraud-RLA: A Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Attack Against Credit Card Fraud DetectionabstractAdversarial attacks pose a significant threat to data-driven systems, and researchers have devoted considerable effort to studying them. Despite its economic relevance, credit card fraud detection has received comparatively little attention. To address this gap, we propose a novel threat model that highlights the limitations of existing attacks and motivates new approaches. We introduce Fraud-RLA, an adversarial attack against credit card Fraud Detection Systems that leverages Reinforcement Learning to evade detection. Fraud-RLA is designed to maximize the amount stolen by optimizing the exploration-exploitation trade-off while requiring substantially less prior knowledge than competing methods. Our experiments on a realistic Fraud Detection System show that Fraud-RLA is effective, even under the severe limitations imposed by our threat model. Daniele Lunghi, Yannick Molinghen, Alkis Simitsis, Tom Lenaerts, Gianluca Bontempi |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 1 |
| 2024 | Assessing adversarial attacks in real-world fraud detectionabstractIn the digital economy, the growing demand for data sharing and trading makes data a critical asset. To facilitate data acquisition between data owners and data buyers, tools such as data markets have emerged. Such modern data ecosystems typically comprise several interconnected components, often based on machine learning. Unfortunately, as practice has shown, such components are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Lacking proper security assessment measures is a severe limitation for the success of data markets. In this paper, we delve into the challenges posed by adversarial attacks using credit card fraud detection as an example use case. We show that popular techniques such as penetration testing through existing adversarial attacks is not a viable approach, and corroborate our analysis by showing how a naive random sample attack outperforms all tested methods when considering the specifics of the fraud detection problem. Motivated by this result, we propose alternative assessment approaches and discuss promising research directions for increasing our understanding of models’ robustness. Daniele Lunghi, Alkis Simitsis, Gianluca Bontempi |
ICWS | 1 |