Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avish Vijayaraghavan

dblp:351/0994 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-2821-1917ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining
1.012026
Microbial named entity recognition and normalisation for AI-assisted literature review and meta-analysis · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
named entity normalization
1.012026
Microbial named entity recognition and normalisation for AI-assisted literature review and meta-analysis · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
named entity recognition
1.012026
Microbial named entity recognition and normalisation for AI-assisted literature review and meta-analysis · Bioinform. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fine-tuning · 1.0deep learning · 1.0BioBERT · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Microbial named entity recognition and normalisation for AI-assisted literature review and meta-analysis
abstract
Abstract Motivation Manual curation of biomedical literature is slow and error-prone and while large language models trained on general texts have shown to be useful for text summarisation, these methods lack the domain-specific expertise required to perform this task accurately. Here we describe the creation of the first microbiome-specific text corpus, use this to train deep learning algorithms for named-entity recognition (NER) and entity linking (EL), and demonstrate their use to meta-analyse microbiome literature. Results The training and validation set (n = 1410) contained a total of 90 150 annotations (both long form and abbreviations). Using the gold-standard test set (n = 288), with an inter-annotator agreement rate of 99.52% for NER and 88.31% for EL, the trained models were evaluated and our fine-tuned BioBERT model achieved an F1-score of 96% for NER surpassing a rule- and dictionary-based annotation pipeline (94%). For EL the accuracy obtained by the deep learning models greatly surpassed that of the pipeline (91% vs 69%). Evaluated across the entire available literature (n = 6927) across 14 domains, our models annotate an entire full-text document in only 7 seconds. Availability All codes are available for automatic annotation and model training, with instructions on how to deploy the model on new text, from GitHub at https://github.com/omicsNLP/microbELP and Zenodo at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20613467. The redistributable, annotated training set and unannotated test set are made available from Zenodo at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17305410 with the redistributable, human-labelled test set hosted as benchmark on Codabench at https://www.codabench.org/competitions/10913/ (for NER only) and at https://www.codabench.org/competitions/11581/ (for NER+EL) for evaluation. The annotated documents for all available literature are hosted separately on Zenodo at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17288826.
Dhylan Patel, Antoine Lain, Avish Vijayaraghavan, Nazanin Faghih-Mirzaei, Monica N. Mweetwa, Tim Beck, Joram M. Posma
Bioinform.3