Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lihan Zha
dblp:351/1290
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 67% Robot manipulation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › manipulation learning
language-conditioned manipulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distilling and Retrieving Generalizable Knowledge for Robot Manipulation via Language Corrections · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › learning from demonstration
learning from corrections |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distilling and Retrieving Generalizable Knowledge for Robot Manipulation via Language Corrections · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distilling and Retrieving Generalizable Knowledge for Robot Manipulation via Language Corrections · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 0.8large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Distilling and Retrieving Generalizable Knowledge for Robot Manipulation via Language CorrectionsabstractToday’s robot policies exhibit subpar performance when faced with the challenge of generalizing to novel environments. Human corrective feedback is a crucial form of guidance to enable such generalization. However, adapting to and learning from online human corrections is a non-trivial endeavor: not only do robots need to remember human feedback over time to retrieve the right information in new settings and reduce the intervention rate, but also they would need to be able to respond to feedback that can be arbitrary corrections about high-level human preferences to low-level adjustments to skill parameters. In this work, we present Distillation and Retrieval of Online Corrections (DROC), a large language model (LLM)-based system that can respond to arbitrary forms of language feedback, distill generalizable knowledge from corrections, and retrieve relevant past experiences based on textual and visual similarity for improving performance in novel settings. DROC is able to respond to a sequence of online language corrections that address failures in both high-level task plans and low-level skill primitives. We demonstrate that DROC effectively distills the relevant information from the sequence of online corrections in a knowledge base and retrieves that knowledge in settings with new task or object instances. DROC outperforms other techniques that directly generate robot code via LLMs [1] by using only half of the total number of corrections needed in the first round and requires little to no corrections after two iterations. We show further results and videos on our project website: https://sites.google.com/stanford.edu/droc. Lihan Zha, Yuchen Cui, Li-Heng Lin, Minae Kwon, Montse Gonzalez Arenas, Andy Zeng 0001, Fei Xia 0002, Dorsa Sadigh |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | DoReMi: Grounding Language Model by Detecting and Recovering from Plan-Execution MisalignmentabstractLarge language models (LLMs) encode a vast amount of semantic knowledge and possess remarkable understanding and reasoning capabilities. Previous work has explored how to ground LLMs in robotic tasks to generate feasible and executable textual plans. However, low-level execution in the physical world may deviate from the high-level textual plan due to environmental perturbations or imperfect controller design. In this paper, we propose DoReMi, a novel language model grounding framework that enables immediate Detection and Recovery from Misalignments between plan and execution. Specifically, we leverage LLMs to play a dual role, aiding not only in high-level planning but also generating constraints that can indicate misalignment during execution. Then vision language models (VLMs) are utilized to detect constraint violations continuously. Our pipeline can monitor the low-level execution and enable timely recovery if certain plan-execution misalignment occurs. Experiments on various complex tasks including robot arms and humanoid robots demonstrate that our method can lead to higher task success rates and shorter task completion times. Yanjiang Guo, Yen-Jen Wang, Lihan Zha, Jianyu Chen 0002 |
IROS | 3 |