EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Logan Anderson
dblp:351/2900
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-5572-726XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization
auto-scheduling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SparseAuto: An Auto-scheduler for Sparse Tensor Computations using Recursive Loop Nest Restructuring · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Compilers and program optimization
loop transformation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SparseAuto: An Auto-scheduler for Sparse Tensor Computations using Recursive Loop Nest Restructuring · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
High-performance computing › tensor computation
sparse tensor algebra |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SparseAuto: An Auto-scheduler for Sparse Tensor Computations using Recursive Loop Nest Restructuring · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
poset-based cost model · 1.5kernel fission and fusion · 1.5SMT solver · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SparseAuto: An Auto-scheduler for Sparse Tensor Computations using Recursive Loop Nest RestructuringabstractAutomated code generation and performance enhancements for sparse tensor algebra have become essential in many real-world applications, such as quantum computing, physical simulations, computational chemistry, and machine learning. General sparse tensor algebra compilers are not always versatile enough to generate asymptotically optimal code for sparse tensor contractions. This paper shows how to generate asymptotically better schedules for complex sparse tensor expressions using kernel fission and fusion. We present generalized loop restructuring transformations to reduce asymptotic time complexity and memory footprint. Furthermore, we present an auto-scheduler that uses a partially ordered set (poset)-based cost model that uses both time and auxiliary memory complexities to prune the search space of schedules. In addition, we highlight the use of Satisfiability Module Theory (SMT) solvers in sparse auto-schedulers to approximate the Pareto frontier of better schedules to the smallest number of possible schedules, with user-defined constraints available at compile-time. Finally, we show that our auto-scheduler can select better-performing schedules and generate code for them. Our results show that the auto-scheduler provided schedules achieve orders of-magnitude speedup compared to the code generated by the Tensor Algebra Compiler (TACO) for several computations on different real-world tensors. Adhitha Dias, Logan Anderson, Kirshanthan Sundararajah, Artem Pelenitsyn, Milind Kulkarni 0001 |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |