Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Minsang Park
dblp:351/2999
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 52% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
4.1 | 5 | 2025 | Diffusion Adaptive Text Embedding for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 Training-Free Safe Text Embedding Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 Diffusion Bridge AutoEncoders for Unsupervised Representation Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Training-Free Safe Text Embedding Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › generative model safety
safe generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Training-Free Safe Text Embedding Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image editing
text-guided image editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Adaptive Text Embedding for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Training-Free Safe Text Embedding Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Adaptive Text Embedding for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Bridge AutoEncoders for Unsupervised Representation Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
dataset bias mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Dataset · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Dataset · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
rejection sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion Rejection Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion Rejection Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment
image-text alignment |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Adaptive Text Embedding for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
text embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Training-Free Safe Text Embedding Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
training-free guidance · 0.9text embedding optimization · 0.9safety function · 0.9information bottleneck · 0.9diffusion sampling · 0.9diffusion bridge · 0.9autoencoder · 0.9time-dependent importance reweighting · 0.8score matching · 0.8rejection sampling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Diffusion Bridge AutoEncoders for Unsupervised Representation LearningabstractDiffusion-based representation learning has achieved substantial attention due to its promising capabilities in latent representation and sample generation. Recent studies have employed an auxiliary encoder to identify a corresponding representation from data and to adjust the dimensionality of a latent variable $\mathbf{z}$. Meanwhile, this auxiliary structure invokes an *information split problem*; the information of each data instance $\mathbf{x}_0$ is divided into diffusion endpoint $\mathbf{x}_T$ and encoded $\mathbf{z}$ because there exist two inference paths starting from the data. The latent variable modeled by diffusion endpoint $\mathbf{x}_T$ has some disadvantages. The diffusion endpoint $\mathbf{x}_T$ is computationally expensive to obtain and inflexible in dimensionality. To address this problem, we introduce Diffusion Bridge AuteEncoders (DBAE), which enables $\mathbf{z}$-dependent endpoint $\mathbf{x}_T$ inference through a feed-forward architecture. This structure creates an information bottleneck at $\mathbf{z}$, so $\mathbf{x}_T$ becomes dependent on $\mathbf{z}$ in its generation. This results in $\mathbf{z}$ holding the full information of data. We propose an objective function for DBAE to enable both reconstruction and generative modeling, with their theoretical justification. Empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of the intended design in DBAE, which notably enhances downstream inference quality, reconstruction, and disentanglement. Additionally, DBAE generates high-fidelity samples in the unconditional generation. Our code is
available at https://github.com/aailab-kaist/DBAE. Yeongmin Kim, Kwanghyeon Lee, Minsang Park, Byeonghu Na, Il-Chul Moon |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Training-Free Safe Text Embedding Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsabstractText-to-image models have recently made significant advances in generating realistic and semantically coherent images, driven by advanced diffusion models and large-scale web-crawled datasets. However, these datasets often contain inappropriate or biased content, raising concerns about the generation of harmful outputs when provided with malicious text prompts. We propose Safe Text embedding Guidance (STG), a training-free approach to improve the safety of diffusion models by guiding the text embeddings during sampling. STG adjusts the text embeddings based on a safety function evaluated on the expected final denoised image, allowing the model to generate safer outputs without additional training. Theoretically, we show that STG aligns the underlying model distribution with safety constraints, thereby achieving safer outputs while minimally affecting generation quality. Experiments on various safety scenarios, including nudity, violence, and artist-style removal, show that STG consistently outperforms both training-based and training-free baselines in removing unsafe content while preserving the core semantic intent of input prompts. Our code is available at https://github.com/aailab-kaist/STG. Byeonghu Na, Mina Kang, Jiseok Kwak, Minsang Park, Jiwoo Shin, SeJoon Jun, Gayoung Lee, Jin-Hwa Kim, Il-Chul Moon |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2025 | Diffusion Adaptive Text Embedding for Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsabstractText-to-image diffusion models rely on text embeddings from a pre-trained text encoder, but these embeddings remain fixed across all diffusion timesteps, limiting their adaptability to the generative process. We propose Diffusion Adaptive Text Embedding (DATE), which dynamically updates text embeddings at each diffusion timestep based on intermediate perturbed data. We formulate an optimization problem and derive an update rule that refines the text embeddings at each sampling step to improve alignment and preference between the mean predicted image and the text. This allows DATE to dynamically adapts the text conditions to the reverse-diffused images throughout diffusion sampling without requiring additional model training. Through theoretical analysis and empirical results, we show that DATE maintains the generative capability of the model while providing superior text-image alignment over fixed text embeddings across various tasks, including multi-concept generation and text-guided image editing. Our code is available at https://github.com/aailab-kaist/DATE. Byeonghu Na, Minsang Park, Gyuwon Sim, Donghyeok Shin, HeeSun Bae, Mina Kang, Se Jung Kwon, Wanmo Kang, Il-Chul Moon |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased DatasetabstractWith significant advancements in diffusion models, addressing the potential risks of dataset bias becomes increasingly important. Since generated outputs directly suffer from dataset bias, mitigating latent bias becomes a key factor in improving sample quality and proportion. This paper proposes time-dependent importance reweighting to mitigate the bias for the diffusion models. We demonstrate that the time-dependent density ratio becomes more precise than previous approaches, thereby minimizing error propagation in generative learning. While directly applying it to score-matching is intractable, we discover that using the time-dependent density ratio both for reweighting and score correction can lead to a tractable form of the objective function to regenerate the unbiased data density. Furthermore, we theoretically establish a connection with traditional score-matching, and we demonstrate its convergence to an unbiased distribution. The experimental evidence supports the usefulness of the proposed method, which outperforms baselines including time-independent importance reweighting on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, FFHQ, and CelebA with various bias settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/alsdudrla10/TIW-DSM. Yeongmin Kim, Byeonghu Na, Minsang Park, JoonHo Jang, Wanmo Kang, Il-Chul Moon |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Diffusion Rejection SamplingabstractRecent advances in powerful pre-trained diffusion models encourage the development of methods to improve the sampling performance under well-trained diffusion models. This paper introduces Diffusion Rejection Sampling (DiffRS), which uses a rejection sampling scheme that aligns the sampling transition kernels with the true ones at each timestep. The proposed method can be viewed as a mechanism that evaluates the quality of samples at each intermediate timestep and refines them with varying effort depending on the sample. Theoretical analysis shows that DiffRS can achieve a tighter bound on sampling error compared to pre-trained models. Empirical results demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of DiffRS on the benchmark datasets and the effectiveness of DiffRS for fast diffusion samplers and large-scale text-to-image diffusion models. Our code is available at https://github.com/aailabkaist/DiffRS. Byeonghu Na, Yeongmin Kim, Minsang Park, Donghyeok Shin, Wanmo Kang, Il-Chul Moon |
ICML | 3 |