Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Denis Peskoff

dblp:351/5377 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 77% Computing education · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
scientometrics
0.912025
Good Intentions Beyond ACL: Who Does NLP for Social Good, and Where? · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
strategic interaction
0.812024
More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play · ACL (1) 2024
Computing education
research community analysis
0.312025
Good Intentions Beyond ACL: Who Does NLP for Social Good, and Where? · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.212024
More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bibliometric analysis · 0.9statistical analysis · 0.8game simulation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Good Intentions Beyond ACL: Who Does NLP for Social Good, and Where?
abstract
The social impact of Natural Language Processing (NLP) is increasingly important, with a rising community focus on initiatives related to NLP for Social Good (NLP4SG).Indeed, in recent years, almost 20% of all papers in the ACL Anthology address topics related to social good as defined by the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Adauto et al., 2023).In this study, we take an author-and venue-level perspective to map the landscape of NLP4SG, quantifying the proportion of work addressing social good concerns both within and beyond the ACL community, by both core ACL contributors and non-ACL authors.With this approach we discover two surprising facts about the landscape of NLP4SG.First, ACL authors are dramatically more likely to do work addressing social good concerns when publishing in venues outside of ACL.Second, the vast majority of publications using NLP techniques to address concerns of social good are done by non-ACL authors in venues outside of ACL.We discuss the implications of these findings on agendasetting considerations for the ACL community related to NLP4SG.
Grace LeFevre, Qingcheng Zeng, Adam Leif, Jason Jewell, Denis Peskoff, Rob Voigt
EMNLP5
2024 More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play
abstract
Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Feng Gu, Yanze Wang, Ulf Hermjakob, Jonathan May, Brandon M. Stewart, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Denis Peskoff, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Ulf Hermjakob, Jonathan May, Brandon M. Stewart, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Denis Peskoff, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
ACL (1)8