Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michelle Thalakottur
dblp:351/6669
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4189-0727ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Programming languages and type systems · 46% Program analysis · 31% Compilers and program optimization · 23% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › intermediate representation
intermediate language |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RichWasm: Bringing Safe, Fine-Grained, Shared-Memory Interoperability Down to WebAssembly · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Programming languages and type systems › language-based security
memory safety |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RichWasm: Bringing Safe, Fine-Grained, Shared-Memory Interoperability Down to WebAssembly · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Programming languages and type systems
type systems |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RichWasm: Bringing Safe, Fine-Grained, Shared-Memory Interoperability Down to WebAssembly · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Program analysis › static analysis
call graph construction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | That's a Tough Call: Studying the Challenges of Call Graph Construction for WebAssembly · ISSTA 2023 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | That's a Tough Call: Studying the Challenges of Call Graph Construction for WebAssembly · ISSTA 2023 |
Programming languages and type systems
webassembly |
0.4 | 2 | 2024 | RichWasm: Bringing Safe, Fine-Grained, Shared-Memory Interoperability Down to WebAssembly · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 That's a Tough Call: Studying the Challenges of Call Graph Construction for WebAssembly · ISSTA 2023 |
Compilers and program optimization
compilation target |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | RichWasm: Bringing Safe, Fine-Grained, Shared-Memory Interoperability Down to WebAssembly · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
type safety proof · 0.8coq · 0.8static analyses · 0.7microbenchmarks · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | RichWasm: Bringing Safe, Fine-Grained, Shared-Memory Interoperability Down to WebAssemblyabstractSafe, shared-memory interoperability between languageswith different type systems and memory-safety guarantees is an intricate problem as crossing language boundaries may result in memory-safety violations. In this paper, we present RichWasm, a novel richly typed intermediate language designed to serve as a compilation target for typed high-level languages with different memory-safety guarantees. RichWasm is based on WebAssemblyand enables safe shared-memory interoperability by incorporating a variety of type features that support fine-grained memory ownership and sharing. RichWasm is rich enough to serve as a typed compilation target for both typed garbage-collected languages and languages with an ownership-based type system and manually managed memory. We demonstrate this by providing compilers from core ML and L 3 , a type-safe language with strong updates, to RichWasm. RichWasm is compiled to regular Wasm, allowing for use in existing environments. We formalize RichWasm in Coq and prove type safety. Michael Fitzgibbons, Zoe Paraskevopoulou, Noble Mushtak, Michelle Thalakottur, Jose Sulaiman Manzur, Amal Ahmed 0001 |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 4 |
| 2023 | That's a Tough Call: Studying the Challenges of Call Graph Construction for WebAssemblyabstractWebAssembly is a low-level bytecode format that powers applications and libraries running in browsers, on the server side, and in standalone runtimes. Call graphs are at the core of many interprocedural static analysis and optimization techniques. However, WebAssembly poses some unique challenges for static call graph construction. Currently, these challenges are neither well understood, nor is it clear to what extent existing techniques address them. This paper presents the first systematic study of WebAssembly-specific challenges for static call graph construction and of the state-of-the-art in call graph analysis. We identify and classify 12 challenges, encode them into a suite of 24 executable microbenchmarks, and measure their prevalence in real-world binaries. These challenges reflect idiosyncrasies of WebAssembly, such as indirect calls via a mutable function table, interactions with the host environment, and unmanaged linear memory. We show that they commonly occur across a set of more than 8,000 real-world binaries. Based on our microbenchmarks and a set of executable real-world binaries, we then study the soundness and precision of four existing static analyses. Our findings include that, surprisingly, all of the existing techniques are unsound, without this being documented anywhere. We envision our work to provide guidance for improving static call graph construction for WebAssembly. In particular, the presented microbenchmarks will enable future work to check whether an analysis supports challenging language features, and to quantify its soundness and precision. Daniel Lehmann 0002, Michelle Thalakottur, Frank Tip, Michael Pradel |
ISSTA | 2 |