Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alperen Yildiz
dblp:351/6771
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositories · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositories · ACL (1) 2025 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositories · ACL (1) 2025 |
Software testing › flaky test
flaky test detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Transforming Test Suites into Croissants · ISSTA 2023 |
Software testing
mutation testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Transforming Test Suites into Croissants · ISSTA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmarking · 1.7LLM-based agents · 0.9LLM-based agent · 0.9mutation testing · 0.7mutation operators · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code RepositoriesabstractAlperen Yildiz, Sin G Teo, Yiling Lou, Yebo Feng, Chong Wang, Dinil Mon Divakaran. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Alperen Yildiz, Sin G. Teo, Yiling Lou, Yebo Feng, Chong Wang 0013, Dinil Mon Divakaran |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Transforming Test Suites into CroissantsabstractSoftware developers often rely on regression testing to ensure that recent changes made to the source code do not introduce bugs. Flaky tests, which non-deterministically pass or fail regardless of any change to the code, can negatively impact the effectiveness of the regression testing. While state-of-the-art is advancing the techniques for test-flakiness detection and mitigation, the community is missing a systematic approach for generating high-quality benchmarks of flaky tests to compare the effectiveness of such techniques. Inspired by the power of mutation testing in evaluating the fault-detection ability of tests, this paper proposes Croissant, a framework for injecting flakiness into the test suites to assess the effectiveness of test-flakiness detection tools in finding these tests. Croissant implements 18 flakiness-inducing mutation operators. We designed these operators to allow controlling the non-determinism involved in flakiness, i.e., making many mutants deterministically pass or fail to observe flaky behavior. Our extensive empirical evaluation of Croissant on the test suites of 15 real-world projects confirms the ability of designed mutation operators to generate high-quality mutants, and their effectiveness in challenging test-flakiness detection tools in revealing flaky tests. Yang Chen 0059, Alperen Yildiz, Darko Marinov, Reyhaneh Jabbarvand Behrouz |
ISSTA | 2 |