EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lane Rizkallah
dblp:351/9469
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-6710-3594ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
evaluation framework |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework of Software Visualizations Effectiveness · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution › program comprehension
software visualization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework of Software Visualizations Effectiveness · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative and quantitative assessment · 1.5multi-dimensional evaluation framework · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework of Software Visualizations EffectivenessabstractVisualizations are useful in dealing with complex software systems, especially in maintenance and evolution tasks. Software visualization tools can help reduce the cognitive burden on practitioners when trying to understand these systems. However, a major challenge in designing new visualization techniques and tools is evaluating their effectiveness for specific tasks and users. If a visualization tool is not effective for practitioners, they are unlikely to adopt it. Existing evaluation frameworks for visualizations mainly focus on expressiveness, which refers to the ability of the visualization to show all necessary information. However, evaluating the effectiveness of visualizations is an open research problem, especially in terms of quantifying it. To address this problem, we propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework that focuses on evaluating visualizations in terms of their qualitative, quantitative, and cognitive aspects. The framework includes seven main dimensions and twenty-eight features, with the effectiveness dimension being further subdivided into four sub-dimensions. We validate our framework by using it to evaluate a number of software visualization tools. This validation demonstrates that the framework can be applied to design and evaluate new software visualization techniques and tools. Hakam W. Alomari, Christopher Vendome, Lane Rizkallah |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |