Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sungwook Yoo

dblp:351/9569 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1025-1036ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
model update
0.712023
How Important is Periodic Model update in Recommender System? · SIGIR 2023
Recommender systems
cold-start recommendation
0.212023
How Important is Periodic Model update in Recommender System? · SIGIR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

periodic retraining analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 How Important is Periodic Model update in Recommender System?
abstract
In real-world recommender model deployments, the models are typically retrained and deployed repeatedly. It is the rule-of-thumb to periodically retrain recommender models to capture up-to-date user behavior and item trends. However, the harm caused by delayed model updates has not been investigated extensively yet. in this perspective paper, we formulate the delayed model update problem and quantitatively demonstrate the delayed model update actually harms the model performance by increasing the number of cold users and cold items increase and decreasing overall model performances. These effects vary across different domains having different characteristics. Upon these findings, we further argue that although the delayed model update has negative effects on online recommender model deployment, yet it has not gathered enough attention from research communities. We argue our verification of the relationship between the model update cycle and model performance calls for further research such as faster model training, and more efficient data pipelines to keep the model more up-to-date with the latest user behaviors and item trends.
Hyunsung Lee, Sungwook Yoo, Jaekwang Kim 0001
SIGIR2