Recently, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has shifted focus to multi-retrieval approaches to tackle complex tasks such as multi-hop question answering. However, these systems struggle to decide when to stop searching once enough information has been gathered. To address this, Zhou et al. [51] introduced Metacognitive Retrieval Augmented Generation (MetaRAG), a framework inspired by metacognition that enables Large Language Models to critique and refine their reasoning. In this reproducibility paper, we reproduce MetaRAG following its original experimental setup and extend it in two directions: (i) by evaluating the effect of PointWise and ListWise rerankers, and (ii) by comparing with SIM-RAG, which employs a lightweight critic model to stop retrieval. Our results confirm MetaRAG's relative improvements over standard RAG and reasoning-based baselines, but also reveal lower absolute scores than reported, reflecting challenges with closed-source LLM updates, missing implementation details, and unreleased prompts. We show that MetaRAG is partially reproduced, gains substantially from reranking, and is more robust than SIM-RAG when extended with additional retrieval features.

Word embeddings have become essential components in various information retrieval and natural language processing tasks, such as ranking, document classification, and question answering. However, despite their widespread use, traditional word embedding models present a limitation in their static nature, which hampers their ability to adapt to the constantly evolving language patterns that emerge in sources such as social media and the web (e.g., new hashtags or brand names). To overcome this problem, incremental word embedding algorithms are introduced, capable of dynamically updating word representations in response to new language patterns and processing continuous data streams.