Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hrittik Roy

dblp:352/2649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 80% Generative modeling · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference
0.812024
Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks
0.812024
Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation
0.812024
Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.812024
Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
riemannian diffusion model
0.812024
Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inference · NeurIPS 2024
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.812024
Gradients of Functions of Large Matrices · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra
0.812024
Gradients of Functions of Large Matrices · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lanczos iteration · 1.5arnoldi iteration · 1.5adjoint systems · 1.5riemannian diffusion process · 0.8linearized laplace approximation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bayes without Underfitting: Fully Correlated Deep Learning Posteriors via Alternating Projections
abstract
Bayesian deep learning all too often underfits so that the Bayesian prediction is less accurate than a simple point estimate. Uncertainty quantification then comes at the cost of accuracy. For linearized models, the null space of the generalized Gauss-Newton matrix corresponds to parameters that preserve the training predictions of the point estimate. We propose to build Bayesian approximations in this null space, thereby guaranteeing that the Bayesian predictive does not underfit. We suggest a matrix-free algorithm for projecting onto this null space, which scales linearly with the number of parameters and quadratically with the number of output dimensions. We further propose an approximation that only scales linearly with parameters to make the method applicable to generative models. An extensive empirical evaluation shows that the approach scales to large models, including vision transformers with 28 million parameters. Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/h-roy/projected-bayes}
Marco Miani, Hrittik Roy, Søren Hauberg
AISTATS2
2025 VIKING: Deep variational inference with stochastic projections
abstract
Variational mean field approximations tend to struggle with contemporary overparametrized deep neural networks. Where a Bayesian treatment is usually associated with high-quality predictions and uncertainties, the practical reality has been the opposite, with unstable training, poor predictive power, and subpar calibration. Building upon recent work on reparametrizations of neural networks, we propose a simple variational family that considers two independent linear subspaces of the parameter space. These represent functional changes inside and outside the support of training data. This allows us to build a fully-correlated approximate posterior reflecting the overparametrization that tunes easy-to-interpret hyperparameters. We develop scalable numerical routines that maximize the associated evidence lower bound (ELBO) and sample from the approximate posterior. Empirically, we observe state-of-the-art performance across tasks, models, and datasets compared to a wide array of baseline methods. Our results show that approximate Bayesian inference applied to deep neural networks is far from a lost cause when constructing inference mechanisms that reflect the geometry of reparametrizations.
Samuel Matthiesen, Hrittik Roy, Nicholas Krämer, Yevgen Zainchkovskyy, Stas Syrota, Alejandro Valverde Mahou, Carl Henrik Ek, Søren Hauberg
NeurIPS2
2024 Gradients of Functions of Large Matrices
abstract
Tuning scientific and probabilistic machine learning models - for example, partial differential equations, Gaussian processes, or Bayesian neural networks - often relies on evaluating functions of matrices whose size grows with the data set or the number of parameters. While the state-of-the-art for _evaluating_ these quantities is almost always based on Lanczos and Arnoldi iterations, the present work is the first to explain how to _differentiate_ these workhorses of numerical linear algebra efficiently. To get there, we derive previously unknown adjoint systems for Lanczos and Arnoldi iterations, implement them in JAX, and show that the resulting code can compete with Diffrax when it comes to differentiating PDEs, GPyTorch for selecting Gaussian process models and beats standard factorisation methods for calibrating Bayesian neural networks. All this is achieved without any problem-specific code optimisation. Find the code at [link redacted] and install the library with *pip install [redacted]*.
Nicholas Krämer, Pablo Moreno-Muñoz, Hrittik Roy, Søren Hauberg
NeurIPS3
2024 Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inference
abstract
Current approximate posteriors in Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) exhibit a crucial limitation: they fail to maintain invariance under reparameterization, i.e. BNNs assign different posterior densities to different parametrizations of identical functions. This creates a fundamental flaw in the application of Bayesian principles as it breaks the correspondence between uncertainty over the parameters with uncertainty over the parametrized function. In this paper, we investigate this issue in the context of the increasingly popular linearized Laplace approximation. Specifically, it has been observed that linearized predictives alleviate the common underfitting problems of the Laplace approximation. We develop a new geometric view of reparametrizations from which we explain the success of linearization. Moreover, we demonstrate that these reparameterization invariance properties can be extended to the original neural network predictive using a Riemannian diffusion process giving a straightforward algorithm for approximate posterior sampling, which empirically improves posterior fit.
Hrittik Roy, Marco Miani, Carl Henrik Ek, Philipp Hennig, Marvin Pförtner, Lukas Tatzel, Søren Hauberg
NeurIPS1