Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Janine Strotherm
dblp:352/4490
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-7013-5167ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 77% Computational science and engineering · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Water Distribution Systems · AAAI 2024 Exact Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exact Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › shapley value
shapley interaction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exact Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph neural network architecture
physics-informed graph neural networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Water Distribution Systems · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
message passing · 2.4unsupervised learning · 1.5physics-informed learning · 1.5graph convolutional network · 1.5shapley interaction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Exact Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Graph Neural NetworksabstractAlbeit the ubiquitous use of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in machine learning (ML) prediction tasks involving graph-structured data, their interpretability remains challenging. In explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), the Shapley Value (SV) is the predominant method to quantify contributions of individual features to a ML model’s output. Addressing the limitations of SVs in complex prediction models, Shapley Interactions (SIs) extend the SV to groups of features. In this work, we explain single graph predictions of GNNs with SIs that quantify node contributions and interactions among multiple nodes. By exploiting the GNN architecture, we show that the structure of interactions in node embeddings are preserved for graph prediction. As a result, the exponential complexity of SIs depends only on the receptive fields, i.e. the message-passing ranges determined by the connectivity of the graph and the number of convolutional layers. Based on our theoretical results, we introduce GraphSHAP-IQ, an efficient approach to compute any-order SIs exactly. GraphSHAP-IQ is applicable to popular message passing techniques in conjunction with a linear global pooling and output layer. We showcase that GraphSHAP-IQ substantially reduces the exponential complexity of computing exact SIs on multiple benchmark datasets. Beyond exact computation, we evaluate GraphSHAP-IQ’s approximation of SIs on popular GNN architectures and compare with existing baselines. Lastly, we visualize SIs of real-world water distribution networks and molecule structures using a SI-Graph. Maximilian Muschalik, Fabian Fumagalli, Paolo Frazzetto, Janine Strotherm, Luca Hermes, Alessandro Sperduti, Eyke Hüllermeier, Barbara Hammer |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Water Distribution SystemsabstractWater distribution systems (WDS) are an integral part of critical infrastructure which is pivotal to urban development. As 70% of the world's population will likely live in urban environments in 2050, efficient simulation and planning tools for WDS play a crucial role in reaching UN's sustainable developmental goal (SDG) 6 - "Clean water and sanitation for all". In this realm, we propose a novel and efficient machine learning emulator, more precisely, a physics-informed deep learning (DL) model, for hydraulic state estimation in WDS. Using a recursive approach, our model only needs a few graph convolutional neural network (GCN) layers and employs an innovative algorithm based on message passing. Unlike conventional machine learning tasks, the model uses hydraulic principles to infer two additional hydraulic state features in the process of reconstructing the available ground truth feature in an unsupervised manner. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first DL approach to emulate the popular hydraulic simulator EPANET, utilizing no additional information. Like most DL models and unlike the hydraulic simulator, our model demonstrates vastly faster emulation times that do not increase drastically with the size of the WDS. Moreover, we achieve high accuracy on the ground truth and very similar results compared to the hydraulic simulator as demonstrated through experiments on five real-world WDS datasets. Inaam Ashraf, Janine Strotherm, Luca Hermes, Barbara Hammer |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Challenges, Methods, Data-A Survey of Machine Learning in Water Distribution Networks
Valerie Vaquet, Fabian Hinder, André Artelt, Inaam Ashraf, Janine Strotherm, Jonas Vaquet, Johannes Brinkrolf, Barbara Hammer |
ICANN (9) | 5 |