Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Federico Matteucci

dblp:352/4741 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › feature engineering
categorical encoding
0.712023
A benchmark of categorical encoders for binary classification · NeurIPS 2023
Data mining
feature engineering
0.712023
A benchmark of categorical encoders for binary classification · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

binary classification · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A benchmark of categorical encoders for binary classification
abstract
Categorical encoders transform categorical features into numerical representations that are indispensable for a wide range of machine learning models.Existing encoder benchmark studies lack generalizability because of their limited choice of (1) encoders, (2) experimental factors, and (3) datasets. Additionally, inconsistencies arise from the adoption of varying aggregation strategies.This paper is the most comprehensive benchmark of categorical encoders to date, including an extensive evaluation of 32 configurations of encoders from diverse families, with 36 combinations of experimental factors, and on 50 datasets.The study shows the profound influence of dataset selection, experimental factors, and aggregation strategies on the benchmark's conclusions~---~aspects disregarded in previous encoder benchmarks.Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/DrCohomology/EncoderBenchmarking}.
Federico Matteucci, Vadim Arzamasov, Klemens Böhm
NeurIPS1