Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Federico Matteucci
dblp:352/4741
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › feature engineering
categorical encoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A benchmark of categorical encoders for binary classification · NeurIPS 2023 |
Data mining
feature engineering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A benchmark of categorical encoders for binary classification · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
binary classification · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | A benchmark of categorical encoders for binary classificationabstractCategorical encoders transform categorical features into numerical representations that are indispensable for a wide range of machine learning models.Existing encoder benchmark studies lack generalizability because of their limited choice of (1) encoders, (2) experimental factors, and (3) datasets. Additionally, inconsistencies arise from the adoption of varying aggregation strategies.This paper is the most comprehensive benchmark of categorical encoders to date, including an extensive evaluation of 32 configurations of encoders from diverse families, with 36 combinations of experimental factors, and on 50 datasets.The study shows the profound influence of dataset selection, experimental factors, and aggregation strategies on the benchmark's conclusions~---~aspects disregarded in previous encoder benchmarks.Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/DrCohomology/EncoderBenchmarking}. Federico Matteucci, Vadim Arzamasov, Klemens Böhm |
NeurIPS | 1 |