EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Minjae Seong
dblp:352/5336
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 66% Robot navigation and mapping · 14% Autonomous driving · 7% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
2.4 | 3 | 2025 | RCTDistill: Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation Framework for Radar-Camera 3D Object Detection with Temporal Fusion · ICCV 2025 CRT-Fusion: Camera, Radar, Temporal Fusion Using Motion Information for 3D Object Detection · NeurIPS 2024 RCM-Fusion: Radar-Camera Multi-Level Fusion for 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › multimodal 3d object detection
radar-camera 3d object detection |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | RCTDistill: Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation Framework for Radar-Camera 3D Object Detection with Temporal Fusion · ICCV 2025 RCM-Fusion: Radar-Camera Multi-Level Fusion for 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor fusion
radar-camera fusion |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | CRT-Fusion: Camera, Radar, Temporal Fusion Using Motion Information for 3D Object Detection · NeurIPS 2024 RCM-Fusion: Radar-Camera Multi-Level Fusion for 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
bird's-eye-view representation |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | CRT-Fusion: Camera, Radar, Temporal Fusion Using Motion Information for 3D Object Detection · NeurIPS 2024 RCM-Fusion: Radar-Camera Multi-Level Fusion for 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | RCM-Fusion: Radar-Camera Multi-Level Fusion for 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PillarGen: Enhancing Radar Point Cloud Density and Quality via Pillar-based Point Generation Network · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud processing › point cloud restoration
point cloud upsampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PillarGen: Enhancing Radar Point Cloud Density and Quality via Pillar-based Point Generation Network · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
temporal fusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CRT-Fusion: Camera, Radar, Temporal Fusion Using Motion Information for 3D Object Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
cross-modal distillation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | RCTDistill: Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation Framework for Radar-Camera 3D Object Detection with Temporal Fusion · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | RCTDistill: Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation Framework for Radar-Camera 3D Object Detection with Temporal Fusion · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
bird's-eye-view detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | PillarGen: Enhancing Radar Point Cloud Density and Quality via Pillar-based Point Generation Network · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
motion estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CRT-Fusion: Camera, Radar, Temporal Fusion Using Motion Information for 3D Object Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporal fusion · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9bird's-eye-view representation · 0.9radar grid point refinement · 0.8point generation network · 0.8pillar encoding · 0.8instance-level fusion · 0.8feature-level fusion · 0.8convolutional neural network · 0.8BEV segmentation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | RCTDistill: Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation Framework for Radar-Camera 3D Object Detection with Temporal FusionabstractRadar-camera fusion methods have emerged as a cost-effective approach for 3D object detection but still lag behind LiDAR-based methods in performance. Recent works have focused on employing temporal fusion and Knowledge Distillation (KD) strategies to overcome these limitations. However, existing approaches have not sufficiently accounted for uncertainties arising from object motion or sensor-specific errors inherent in radar and camera modalities. In this work, we propose RCTDistill, a novel cross-modal KD method based on temporal fusion, comprising three key modules: Range-Azimuth Knowledge Distillation (RAKD), Temporal Knowledge Distillation (TKD), and Region-Decoupled Knowledge Distillation (RDKD). RAKD is designed to consider the inherent errors in the range and azimuth directions, enabling effective knowledge transfer from LiDAR features to refine inaccurate BEV representations. TKD mitigates temporal misalignment caused by dynamic objects by aligning historical radar-camera BEV features with current LiDAR representations. RDKD enhances feature discrimination by distilling relational knowledge from the teacher model, allowing the student to differentiate foreground and background features. RCTDistill achieves state-of-the-art radar-camera fusion performance on both the nuScenes and View-of-Delft (VoD) datasets, with the fastest inference speed of 26.2 FPS. Geonho Bang, Minjae Seong, Jisong Kim, Geunju Baek, Daye Oh, Junhyung Kim, Junho Koh |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2024 | PillarGen: Enhancing Radar Point Cloud Density and Quality via Pillar-based Point Generation NetworkabstractIn this paper, we present a novel point generation model, referred to as Pillar-based Point Generation Network (PillarGen), which facilitates the transformation of point clouds from one domain into another. PillarGen can produce synthetic point clouds with enhanced density and quality based on the provided input point clouds. The PillarGen model performs the following three steps: 1) pillar encoding, 2) Occupied Pillar Prediction (OPP), and 3) Pillar to Point Generation (PPG). The input point clouds are encoded using a pillar grid structure to generate pillar features. Then, OPP determines the active pillars used for point generation and predicts the center of points and the number of points to be generated for each active pillar. PPG generates the synthetic points for each active pillar based on the information provided by OPP. We evaluate the performance of PillarGen using our proprietary radar dataset, focusing on enhancing the density and quality of short-range radar data using the long-range radar data as supervision. Our experiments demonstrate that PillarGen outperforms traditional point upsampling methods in quantitative and qualitative measures. We also confirm that when PillarGen is incorporated into bird’s eye view object detection, a significant improvement in detection accuracy is achieved. Jisong Kim, Geonho Bang, Kwangjin Choi, Minjae Seong, Jaechang Yoo, Eunjong Pyo |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2024 | RCM-Fusion: Radar-Camera Multi-Level Fusion for 3D Object DetectionabstractWhile LiDAR sensors have been successfully applied to 3D object detection, the affordability of radar and camera sensors has led to a growing interest in fusing radars and cameras for 3D object detection. However, previous radar-camera fusion models could not fully utilize the potential of radar information. In this paper, we propose Radar-Camera Multi-level fusion (RCM-Fusion), which attempts to fuse both modalities at feature and instance levels. For feature-level fusion, we propose a Radar Guided BEV Encoder which transforms camera features into precise BEV representations using the guidance of radar Bird’s-Eye-View (BEV) features and combines the radar and camera BEV features. For instance-level fusion, we propose a Radar Grid Point Refinement module that reduces localization error by accounting for the characteristics of the radar point clouds. The experiments on the public nuScenes dataset demonstrate that our proposed RCM-Fusion achieves state-of-the-art performances among single frame-based radar-camera fusion methods in the nuScenes 3D object detection benchmark. The code will be made publicly available. Jisong Kim, Minjae Seong, Geonho Bang, Dongsuk Kum |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2024 | CRT-Fusion: Camera, Radar, Temporal Fusion Using Motion Information for 3D Object DetectionabstractAccurate and robust 3D object detection is a critical component in autonomous vehicles and robotics. While recent radar-camera fusion methods have made significant progress by fusing information in the bird's-eye view (BEV) representation, they often struggle to effectively capture the motion of dynamic objects, leading to limited performance in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we introduce CRT-Fusion, a novel framework that integrates temporal information into radar-camera fusion to address this challenge. Our approach comprises three key modules: Multi-View Fusion (MVF), Motion Feature Estimator (MFE), and Motion Guided Temporal Fusion (MGTF). The MVF module fuses radar and image features within both the camera view and bird's-eye view, thereby generating a more precise unified BEV representation. The MFE module conducts two simultaneous tasks: estimation of pixel-wise velocity information and BEV segmentation. Based on the velocity and the occupancy score map obtained from the MFE module, the MGTF module aligns and fuses feature maps across multiple timestamps in a recurrent manner. By considering the motion of dynamic objects, CRT-Fusion can produce robust BEV feature maps, thereby improving detection accuracy and robustness. Extensive evaluations on the challenging nuScenes dataset demonstrate that CRT-Fusion achieves state-of-the-art performance for radar-camera-based 3D object detection. Our approach outperforms the previous best method in terms of NDS by +1.7%, while also surpassing the leading approach in mAP by +1.4%. These significant improvements in both metrics showcase the effectiveness of our proposed fusion strategy in enhancing the reliability and accuracy of 3D object detection. Jisong Kim, Minjae Seong |
NeurIPS | 2 |